Ensuring equity in psychosocial risk assessment for solid organ transplantation: a review

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose of review</jats:title> <jats:p>This review summarizes the different instruments for evaluating the psychosocial health of transplant candidates, the evidence demonstrating how these instruments relate to probability of transplant waitlisting and transplant outcomes, and the critical knowledge gaps that exist in the causal pathway between psychosocial health and clinical transplant trajectory.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Recent findings</jats:title> <jats:p>The current literature reveals that psychosocial assessments are a common reason for racial and ethnic minorities to be denied access to the transplant list. Given evidence that a lack of clinician consensus exists regarding the definition of, importance of, and reproducibility of psychosocial support evaluations, this facet of the holistic evaluation process may create a unique challenge for already vulnerable patient populations. Though recent evidence shows that psychosocial evaluation scores predict select transplant outcomes, these findings remain inconsistent.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Summary</jats:title> <jats:p>Multiple instruments for psychosocial transplant evaluation exist, though the utility of these instruments remains uncertain. As equity becomes an increasingly urgent priority for the transplant system, rigorous interrogation of the causal pathway between psychosocial health and transplant longevity is still needed.</jats:p> </jats:sec>