Rickettsiosis subcommittee report to the tick-borne disease working group.

dc.contributor.author

Walker, David H

dc.contributor.author

Myers, Cdr Todd E

dc.contributor.author

Blanton, Lucas S

dc.contributor.author

Bloch, Karen C

dc.contributor.author

Fowler, Vance G

dc.contributor.author

Gaines, David N

dc.contributor.author

Paddock, Christopher D

dc.contributor.author

Yaglom, Hayley D

dc.date.accessioned

2022-02-01T19:51:32Z

dc.date.available

2022-02-01T19:51:32Z

dc.date.issued

2022-01

dc.date.updated

2022-02-01T19:51:31Z

dc.description.abstract

Tick-borne rickettsial infections are serious, common, and difficult to diagnose. Among the most important factors leading to failure to diagnose and treat tick-borne rickettsioses effectively is a lack of consideration of the potential diagnosis by primary caregivers and emergency department physicians in patients presenting with undifferentiated acute febrile illness during tick season. This situation exists because of insufficient primary and continuing medical education of medical students, primary care and emergency medicine residents, and practicing physicians regarding tick-borne rickettsioses specific to the region where they practice. Delayed initiation of treatment with an appropriate antibiotic is associated with adverse outcomes including increased rates of hospitalization, admission to an intensive care unit, and mortality. The earliest symptoms are nonspecific, consisting of fever, headache, myalgias, and nausea and/or vomiting. Laboratory abnormalities are typically absent at this time when the therapeutic response to an appropriate antibiotic would be optimal. There is a mistaken idea among a substantial portion of physicians that the best antibiotic available, doxycycline, should not be administered to children 8 years of age or younger or during pregnancy. For all of the above reasons, there is unnecessary morbidity and mortality caused by tick-borne rickettsioses. This report proposes measures to address these critical issues regarding tick-borne rickettsioses.

dc.identifier

S1877-959X(21)00208-9

dc.identifier.issn

1877-959X

dc.identifier.issn

1877-9603

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24320

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Ticks and tick-borne diseases

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.ttbdis.2021.101855

dc.subject

Clinical awareness and knowledge

dc.subject

Epidemiologic surveillance

dc.subject

Laboratory diagnosis

dc.subject

Rickettsia

dc.subject

Ticks

dc.title

Rickettsiosis subcommittee report to the tick-borne disease working group.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Fowler, Vance G|0000-0002-8048-0897

pubs.begin-page

101855

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Molecular Genetics and Microbiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Infectious Diseases

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

13

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Walker Rickettsiosis report Ticks 2021.pdf
Size:
448.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format