Validation of the Oswestry Disability Index in Adult Spinal Deformity.

dc.contributor.author

Jalali, Omid

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Bess, Shay

dc.contributor.author

Hostin, Richard

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Renaud

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Ames, Christopher P

dc.contributor.author

Lenke, Lawrence G

dc.contributor.author

Kelly, Michael P

dc.contributor.author

International Spine Study Group

dc.date.accessioned

2024-02-26T12:23:27Z

dc.date.available

2024-02-26T12:23:27Z

dc.date.issued

2024-02

dc.description.abstract

Study design

Retrospective cohort.

Objective

To examine the validity of the ODI in ASD patients treated with surgery.

Summary of background data

The ODI is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of low back pain and disability. While nearly ubiquitous in adult spinal deformity (ASD) research, the measure has not been validated in this patient population.

Methods

A registry of ASD patients was queried for baseline and 1-year PROM data, including the ODI, the SRS-22r, and the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Pain Interference (PI), and -Physical Function(PF) computer adaptive tests (CAT). Internal reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha, where values≥0.7 are considered reliable. Validity was assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients calculated for the ODI against validated PROMIS-Pain Interference and -Physical Function and legacy measures SRS-Pain, SRS-Activity. Responsiveness to change was measured with the adjusted effect size (aES).

Results

325 patients were enrolled, with 208 completing baseline and one-year PROMs. The majority (149, 72%) were female and white (193, 93%), median Charlson Comorbidity Index 0 (IQR 0-2). The majority of cases included sagittal plane deformity (mean T1PA 24.2° (13.9). Cronbach's alpha showed excellent internal reliability (Baseline=0.89, 1yr=0.90). ODI was valid, with strong correlations between PROMIS-PI, -PF, SRS-Pain, and SRS-Activity at baseline and one-year follow-up. All measures were responsive to change, with the ODI showing greater responsiveness than PROMIS-PI, PROMIS-PF and SRS-Activity.

Conclusions

The ODI is a valid measure of disability as measured by pain and function in patients with ASD. It is responsive to change in a manner not different from validated PROMIS-CAT or the SRS-22r legacy measure. It is multidimensional, however, as it assesses both pain and function simultaneously. It does not measure disability related to Self-Image and may not account for all disease-related disability in ASD patients.
dc.identifier

00007632-990000000-00592

dc.identifier.issn

0362-2436

dc.identifier.issn

1528-1159

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30194

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Spine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1097/brs.0000000000004960

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

International Spine Study Group

dc.title

Validation of the Oswestry Disability Index in Adult Spinal Deformity.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Validation of the Oswestry Disability Index in Adult Spinal Deformity.pdf
Size:
1004.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format