Boma fortification is cost-effective at reducing predation of livestock in a high-predation zone in the Western Mara Region, Kenya

dc.contributor.author

Sutton, AE

dc.contributor.author

Downey, MG

dc.contributor.author

Kamande, E

dc.contributor.author

Munyao, F

dc.contributor.author

Rinaldi, M

dc.contributor.author

Taylor, AK

dc.contributor.author

Pimm, S

dc.date.accessioned

2021-08-02T18:28:28Z

dc.date.available

2021-08-02T18:28:28Z

dc.date.issued

2017-01-01

dc.date.updated

2021-08-02T18:28:27Z

dc.description.abstract

Lions Panthera leo kill livestock in the pastoral steppe of East Africa. The subsequent lethal retaliation by livestock owners has helped reduce lion numbers by more than 80% and driven the species from most of its historic range. This conflict is especially intense along the western edge of the Maasai Mara National Reserve in Kenya, where some of the densest lion and livestock populations in Africa overlap. We evaluated the effectiveness of implementation for one proposed solution – the Anne K. Taylor Fund’s subsidized construction of fortified, chain-link livestock fences (‘bomas’) – in reducing livestock loss to depredation. Between 2013 and 2015 we collected 343 predation reports, based on semi-structured interviews and predation records. We used these data to study the impact of subsidised boma fortification on the depredation of cattle, sheep and goats. Of 179 fortified bomas, 67% suffered no losses over one year whereas only 15% of 60 unfortified bomas had no losses over one year. Furthermore, losses of greater than five animals per year occurred at only 17% of fortified bomas, compared to 57% of unfortified bomas. The overall reduction in losses to predation at fortified bomas equated to savings of more than &1,200 USD per household per year.

dc.identifier.issn

1758-2067

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23540

dc.relation.ispartof

Conservation Evidence

dc.title

Boma fortification is cost-effective at reducing predation of livestock in a high-predation zone in the Western Mara Region, Kenya

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Pimm, S|0000-0003-4206-2456

pubs.begin-page

32

pubs.end-page

38

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

14

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
320 Sutton et al Conservation Evidence .pdf
Size:
835.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format