Evaluation of a Family Connects Dissemination to Four High-Poverty Rural Counties.

dc.contributor.author

Goodman, W Benjamin

dc.contributor.author

Dodge, Kenneth A

dc.contributor.author

Bai, Yu

dc.contributor.author

Murphy, Robert A

dc.contributor.author

O'Donnell, Karen

dc.date.accessioned

2022-07-11T18:01:43Z

dc.date.available

2022-07-11T18:01:43Z

dc.date.issued

2022-05

dc.date.updated

2022-07-11T18:01:43Z

dc.description.abstract

Objectives

Home visiting is a popular approach to improving the health and well-being of families with infants and young children in the United States; but, to date, no home visiting program has achieved population impact for families in rural communities. The current report includes evaluation results from the dissemination of a brief, universal postpartum home visiting program to four high-poverty rural counties.

Methods

The study utilized a quasi-experimental design. From Sept. 1, 2014-Dec. 31, 2015, families of all 994 resident births in four rural eastern North Carolina counties were assigned to receive Family Connects (FC; intervention group). A representative subsample of families participated in impact evaluation when the infants were 6 months old: 392 intervention group families and 126 families with infants born between Feb. 1, 2014-July 31, 2014 (natural comparison group). Data were analyzed preliminarily for reporting to funders in 2016 and, more comprehensively, using propensity score matching in 2020.

Results

Of FC-eligible families, 78% initiated participation; 83% of participating families completed the program (net completion = 65%). At age 6 months, intervention parents reported more community connections, more frequent use of community services, greater social support, and greater success with infants sleeping on their backs. Intervention infants had fewer total emergency department and urgent care visits. Intervention parents had more total emergency department and urgent care visits and (marginally) fewer overnights in the hospital.

Conclusions for practice

FC can be implemented successfully in high-poverty rural communities with broad reach and positive benefits for infants and families.
dc.identifier

10.1007/s10995-021-03297-y

dc.identifier.issn

1092-7875

dc.identifier.issn

1573-6628

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25479

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer

dc.relation.ispartof

Maternal and child health journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s10995-021-03297-y

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Postnatal Care

dc.subject

Program Evaluation

dc.subject

Postpartum Period

dc.subject

Pregnancy

dc.subject

Poverty

dc.subject

Child

dc.subject

Child, Preschool

dc.subject

Infant

dc.subject

Rural Population

dc.subject

House Calls

dc.subject

United States

dc.subject

Female

dc.title

Evaluation of a Family Connects Dissemination to Four High-Poverty Rural Counties.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Goodman, W Benjamin|0000-0002-2417-1483

duke.contributor.orcid

Dodge, Kenneth A|0000-0001-5932-215X

duke.contributor.orcid

Bai, Yu|0000-0003-0515-8248

pubs.begin-page

1067

pubs.end-page

1076

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry, Child & Family Mental Health & Community Psychiatry

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

26

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Goodman et al. (2022) - Northeast Connects Evaluation.pdf
Size:
638.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version