One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2008-11

Authors

Joh, Amy S
Keen, RE

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Citation Stats

Abstract

The ability to isolate a single sound source among concurrent sources and reverberant energy is necessary for understanding the auditory world. The precedence effect describes a related experimental finding, that when presented with identical sounds from two locations with a short onset asynchrony (on the order of milliseconds), listeners report a single source with a location dominated by the lead sound. Single-cell recordings in multiple animal models have indicated that there are low-level mechanisms that may contribute to the precedence effect, yet psychophysical studies in humans have provided evidence that top-down cognitive processes have a great deal of influence on the perception of simulated echoes. In the present study, event-related potentials evoked by click pairs at and around listeners' echo thresholds indicate that perception of the lead and lag sound as individual sources elicits a negativity between 100 and 250 msec, previously termed the object-related negativity (ORN). Even for physically identical stimuli, the ORN is evident when listeners report hearing, as compared with not hearing, a second sound source. These results define a neural mechanism related to the conscious perception of multiple auditory objects.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3758/PP.70.8.1558

Publication Info

Sanders, LD, Amy S Joh, RE Keen and RL Freyman (2008). One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception. Percept Psychophys, 70(8). pp. 1558–1570. 10.3758/PP.70.8.1558 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6387.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.