One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception.

Loading...

Date

2008-11

Authors

Joh, Amy S
Keen, RE

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

247
views
114
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

The ability to isolate a single sound source among concurrent sources and reverberant energy is necessary for understanding the auditory world. The precedence effect describes a related experimental finding, that when presented with identical sounds from two locations with a short onset asynchrony (on the order of milliseconds), listeners report a single source with a location dominated by the lead sound. Single-cell recordings in multiple animal models have indicated that there are low-level mechanisms that may contribute to the precedence effect, yet psychophysical studies in humans have provided evidence that top-down cognitive processes have a great deal of influence on the perception of simulated echoes. In the present study, event-related potentials evoked by click pairs at and around listeners' echo thresholds indicate that perception of the lead and lag sound as individual sources elicits a negativity between 100 and 250 msec, previously termed the object-related negativity (ORN). Even for physically identical stimuli, the ORN is evident when listeners report hearing, as compared with not hearing, a second sound source. These results define a neural mechanism related to the conscious perception of multiple auditory objects.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Adult, Auditory Perception, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Psychophysics

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3758/PP.70.8.1558

Publication Info

Sanders, LD, Amy S Joh, RE Keen and RL Freyman (2008). One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception. Percept Psychophys, 70(8). pp. 1558–1570. 10.3758/PP.70.8.1558 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6387.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.