Development and validation of an electronic health records-based opioid use disorder algorithm by expert clinical adjudication among patients with prescribed opioids.

dc.contributor.author

Ranapurwala, Shabbar I

dc.contributor.author

Alam, Ishrat Z

dc.contributor.author

Pence, Brian W

dc.contributor.author

Carey, Timothy S

dc.contributor.author

Christensen, Sean

dc.contributor.author

Clark, Marshall

dc.contributor.author

Chelminski, Paul R

dc.contributor.author

Wu, Li-Tzy

dc.contributor.author

Greenblatt, Lawrence H

dc.contributor.author

Korte, Jeffrey E

dc.contributor.author

Wolfson, Mark

dc.contributor.author

Douglas, Heather E

dc.contributor.author

Bowlby, Lynn A

dc.contributor.author

Capata, Michael

dc.contributor.author

Marshall, Stephen W

dc.date.accessioned

2023-09-01T17:10:45Z

dc.date.available

2023-09-01T17:10:45Z

dc.date.issued

2023-05

dc.date.updated

2023-09-01T17:10:44Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

In the US, over 200 lives are lost from opioid overdoses each day. Accurate and prompt diagnosis of opioid use disorders (OUD) may help prevent overdose deaths. However, international classification of disease (ICD) codes for OUD are known to underestimate prevalence, and their specificity and sensitivity are unknown. We developed and validated algorithms to identify OUD in electronic health records (EHR) and examined the validity of OUD ICD codes.

Methods

Through four iterations, we developed EHR-based OUD identification algorithms among patients who were prescribed opioids from 2014 to 2017. The algorithms and OUD ICD codes were validated against 169 independent "gold standard" EHR chart reviews conducted by an expert adjudication panel across four healthcare systems. After using 2014-2020 EHR for validating iteration 1, the experts were advised to use 2014-2017 EHR thereafter.

Results

Of the 169 EHR charts, 81 (48%) were reviewed by more than one expert and exhibited 85% expert agreement. The experts identified 54 OUD cases. The experts endorsed all 11 OUD criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5, including craving (72%), tolerance (65%), withdrawal (56%), and recurrent use in physically hazardous conditions (50%). The OUD ICD codes had 10% sensitivity and 99% specificity, underscoring large underestimation. In comparison our algorithm identified OUD with 23% sensitivity and 98% specificity.

Conclusions and relevance

This is the first study to estimate the validity of OUD ICD codes and develop validated EHR-based OUD identification algorithms. This work will inform future research on early intervention and prevention of OUD.
dc.identifier.issn

1053-8569

dc.identifier.issn

1099-1557

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28950

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1002/pds.5591

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Opioid-Related Disorders

dc.subject

Analgesics, Opioid

dc.subject

Algorithms

dc.subject

Delivery of Health Care

dc.subject

Electronic Health Records

dc.subject

Drug Overdose

dc.title

Development and validation of an electronic health records-based opioid use disorder algorithm by expert clinical adjudication among patients with prescribed opioids.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Wu, Li-Tzy|0000-0002-5909-2259

pubs.begin-page

577

pubs.end-page

585

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Family Medicine and Community Health

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Family Medicine and Community Health, Community Health

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry, Child & Family Mental Health & Community Psychiatry

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

32

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ranapurwala...Wu 2023 validate EHR OUD algorithm by expert clinical adjudication in patients with prescribed opioids.pdf
Size:
922.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version