Addressing food insecurity: a paediatric academic advocacy collaborative quality initiative

dc.contributor.author

Amati, J Blakely Andrews

dc.contributor.author

Mehta, Shivani

dc.contributor.author

Buitrago Mogollon, Talia

dc.contributor.author

Maldonado, Lizmarie

dc.contributor.author

Sease, Kerry K

dc.contributor.author

Best, Debra

dc.contributor.author

Montez, Kimberly

dc.contributor.author

Vander Schaaf, Emily

dc.contributor.author

Erickson, Elizabeth

dc.contributor.author

Holloway, Jeffrey

dc.contributor.author

Gustafson, Kristina

dc.contributor.author

Roberts, James

dc.contributor.author

Avery, Carolyn

dc.date.accessioned

2025-05-20T20:47:15Z

dc.date.available

2025-05-20T20:47:15Z

dc.date.issued

2025-04

dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective</jats:title> <jats:p>This quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to address food insecurity (FI) by improving FI identification and referral to food assistance programmes for the families served by the eight paediatric academic institutions in North and South Carolina.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The primary process measures were screening 80% of eligible families for FI and coding for FI. The outcome measure was referring 80% of families identified with FI to appropriate resources. The balancing measure was maintaining a rate below 20% of missed opportunities for referral. Change ideas were organised into four main key drivers. The eight teaching clinics of the Carolinas Collaborative completed monthly chart audits using the Quality Improvement Data Aggregator (QIDA). Baseline was December 2020 and implementation occurred January 2021�May 2022. Creation of run charts was later transferred to statistical process control charts. Standard probability or Montgomery rules were used to identify special cause variation. Sites used individual QIDA data to conduct Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles; aggregated data were shared during bimonthly meetings.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>A total of 4270 eligible charts were audited, 3430 patients screened and 525 identified as having FI. The rate of FI screening shifted from 68.5% to 86%. The rate of FI identified remained at 15%, and food referrals were consistently offered 90% of the time. While FI diagnostic coding did not reach the 80% goal, there was a shift from 38.3% to 70.5%. The balancing measure remained well below the goal of less than 20% of missed opportunities to discuss positive FI (centreline of 9.5%).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>A paediatric academic collaborative QI initiative focused on FI demonstrated collective improvement and allowed for rapid implementation, dissemination and spread.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.identifier.issn

2399-6641

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/32406

dc.language

en

dc.publisher

BMJ

dc.relation.ispartof

BMJ Open Quality

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003083

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.title

Addressing food insecurity: a paediatric academic advocacy collaborative quality initiative

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Best, Debra|0000-0002-4166-3391

pubs.begin-page

e003083

pubs.end-page

e003083

pubs.issue

2

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Family Medicine and Community Health

pubs.organisational-group

Pediatrics

pubs.organisational-group

Family Medicine and Community Health, Community Health

pubs.organisational-group

Pediatrics, General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

14

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BMJ Quality Open Paper.pdf
Size:
1.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format