Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening.
Date
2025-03
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Background
Many organizations recommend clinicians use structured communication processes, referred to as shared decision-making, to improve patient-reported outcomes for patients considering lung cancer screening (LCS).Research question
Which components of high-quality patient-centered communication are associated with decision regret and distress?Study design and methods
We conducted a prospective, longitudinal, repeated measures cohort study among patients undergoing LCS in three different health care systems. We surveyed participants using validated measures of decision regret, decision satisfaction, distress, and patient-clinician communication domains up to 1 year after the low-dose CT (LDCT) imaging for LCS. For longitudinal analyses, we applied a series of generalized estimating equations to measure the association of the patient as person communication domain, screening knowledge, and decision concordance with decision regret and distress.Results
When assessed 2 to 4 weeks after the LDCT imaging, 202 respondents (58.9%) and eight respondents (2.3%) of 343 total respondents reported mild and moderate or severe decision regret, respectively, whereas 29 respondents (9.2%) of 315 total respondents reported mild distress and 19 respondents (6.0%) reported moderate or greater distress. The mean ± SD decision satisfaction scores (scale, 0-10) were 9.82 ± 0.89, 9.08 ± 1.54, and 6.13 ± 3.40 among those with no, mild, and moderate or severe regret, respectively. Distress scores remained low after the LDCT imaging, even among those with nodules. Patient-centered communication domains were not associated with decision regret or distress.Interpretation
Our findings show that patients undergoing LCS rarely experience moderate or greater decision regret and distress. Although many participants reported mild decision regret, most were very satisfied over the 1 year after LDCT imaging for LCS. Communication processes were not associated with regret and distress, suggesting that it may be challenging for communication interventions to reduce the harms of LCS.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Slatore, Christopher G, Sara E Golden, Liana Schweiger, Ian Ilea, Donald R Sullivan, Sean PM Rice, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Santanu Datta, et al. (2025). Longitudinal Assessment of Communication With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Lung Cancer Screening. Chest, 167(3). pp. 876–891. 10.1016/j.chest.2024.06.3817 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34767.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
James Davis
Dr. James Davis is a practicing physician of Internal Medicine, and serves as the Medical Director for Duke Center for Smoking Cessation, Director of the Duke Smoking Cessation Program and Co-Director of the Duke-UNC Tobacco Treatment Specialist Credentialing Program. His research focuses on development of new pharmaceutical treatments for smoking cessation. He is principal investigator on several trials including a study on “adaptive” smoking cessation and several trials on new medications for smoking cessation. The new medications leverage more novel neurobiological mechanisms - NMDA receptor antagonism, nicotinic receptor antagonism, which impact addiction-based learning and cue response. Additionally, Dr. Davis serves as co-investigator on trials on lung cancer screening, e-cigarettes, minor nicotine alkaloids, imaging trials, lung function trials and others. Dr. Davis leads the Duke Smoke-Free Policy Initiative, is co-author on a national tobacco dependence treatment guideline, and provides training in tobacco dependence treatment for the Duke School of Medicine, Duke Internal Medicine, Family Practice and Psychiatry residency programs.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.
