Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Image-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement at the Site of Latest Mechanical Activation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

dc.contributor.author

Allen LaPointe, Nancy M

dc.contributor.author

Ali-Ahmed, Fatima

dc.contributor.author

Dalgaard, Frederik

dc.contributor.author

Kosinski, Andrzej S

dc.contributor.author

Schmidler, Gillian Sanders

dc.contributor.author

Al-Khatib, Sana M

dc.contributor.editor

Maekawa, Yuichiro

dc.date.accessioned

2022-06-23T14:26:07Z

dc.date.available

2022-06-23T14:26:07Z

dc.date.issued

2022-01

dc.date.updated

2022-06-23T14:26:05Z

dc.description.abstract

Aim

To assess evidence for an image-guided approach for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that targets left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the segment of latest mechanical activation.

Methods

A systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies from October 2008 through October 2020 that compared an image-guided CRT approach with a non-image-guided approach for LV lead placement. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the association between the image-guided approach and NYHA class improvement or changes in end-systolic volume (LVESV), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results

From 5897 citations, 5 RCTs including 818 patients (426 image-guided and 392 non-image-guided) were identified. The mean age ranged from 66 to 71 years, 76% were male, and 53% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Speckle tracking echocardiography was the primary image-guided method in all studies. LV lead placement within the segment of the latest mechanical activation (concordant) was achieved in the image-guided arm in 45% of the evaluable patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in the NYHA class at 6 months (odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.02, 2.69]) with the image-guided approach, but no statistically significant change in LVESV (MD -7.1%; 95% CI [-16.0, 1.8]), LVEDV (MD -5.2%; 95% CI [-15.8, 5.4]), or LVEF (MD 0.68; 95% CI [-4.36, 5.73]) versus the non-image-guided approach.

Conclusion

The image-guided CRT approach was associated with improvement in the NYHA class but not echocardiographic measures, possibly due to the small sample size and a low rate of concordant LV lead placement despite using the image-guided approach. Therefore, our meta-analysis was not able to identify consistent improvement in CRT outcomes with an image-guided approach.
dc.identifier.issn

0896-4327

dc.identifier.issn

1540-8183

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25396

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Hindawi Limited

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of interventional cardiology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1155/2022/6285894

dc.subject

Heart Ventricles

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Myocardial Ischemia

dc.subject

Echocardiography

dc.subject

Stroke Volume

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

dc.subject

Observational Studies as Topic

dc.title

Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Image-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement at the Site of Latest Mechanical Activation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Allen LaPointe, Nancy M|0000-0002-6390-8337

duke.contributor.orcid

Kosinski, Andrzej S|0000-0003-4151-5185

duke.contributor.orcid

Al-Khatib, Sana M|0000-0002-3561-0146

pubs.begin-page

6285894

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center for Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

2022

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6285894.pdf
Size:
559.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version