Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Image-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement at the Site of Latest Mechanical Activation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
dc.contributor.author | Allen LaPointe, Nancy M | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali-Ahmed, Fatima | |
dc.contributor.author | Dalgaard, Frederik | |
dc.contributor.author | Kosinski, Andrzej S | |
dc.contributor.author | Schmidler, Gillian Sanders | |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Khatib, Sana M | |
dc.contributor.editor | Maekawa, Yuichiro | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-23T14:26:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-23T14:26:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-06-23T14:26:05Z | |
dc.description.abstract | AimTo assess evidence for an image-guided approach for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that targets left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the segment of latest mechanical activation.MethodsA systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies from October 2008 through October 2020 that compared an image-guided CRT approach with a non-image-guided approach for LV lead placement. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the association between the image-guided approach and NYHA class improvement or changes in end-systolic volume (LVESV), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and ejection fraction (LVEF).ResultsFrom 5897 citations, 5 RCTs including 818 patients (426 image-guided and 392 non-image-guided) were identified. The mean age ranged from 66 to 71 years, 76% were male, and 53% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Speckle tracking echocardiography was the primary image-guided method in all studies. LV lead placement within the segment of the latest mechanical activation (concordant) was achieved in the image-guided arm in 45% of the evaluable patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in the NYHA class at 6 months (odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.02, 2.69]) with the image-guided approach, but no statistically significant change in LVESV (MD -7.1%; 95% CI [-16.0, 1.8]), LVEDV (MD -5.2%; 95% CI [-15.8, 5.4]), or LVEF (MD 0.68; 95% CI [-4.36, 5.73]) versus the non-image-guided approach.ConclusionThe image-guided CRT approach was associated with improvement in the NYHA class but not echocardiographic measures, possibly due to the small sample size and a low rate of concordant LV lead placement despite using the image-guided approach. Therefore, our meta-analysis was not able to identify consistent improvement in CRT outcomes with an image-guided approach. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0896-4327 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1540-8183 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Hindawi Limited | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of interventional cardiology | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1155/2022/6285894 | |
dc.subject | Heart Ventricles | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Myocardial Ischemia | |
dc.subject | Echocardiography | |
dc.subject | Stroke Volume | |
dc.subject | Aged | |
dc.subject | Female | |
dc.subject | Male | |
dc.subject | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy | |
dc.subject | Observational Studies as Topic | |
dc.title | Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Image-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement at the Site of Latest Mechanical Activation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Allen LaPointe, Nancy M|0000-0002-6390-8337 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Kosinski, Andrzej S|0000-0003-4151-5185 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Al-Khatib, Sana M|0000-0002-3561-0146 | |
pubs.begin-page | 6285894 | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Centers | |
pubs.organisational-group | Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Medicine, Cardiology | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Clinical Research Institute | |
pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Provost's Academic Units | |
pubs.organisational-group | University Institutes and Centers | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke - Margolis Center for Health Policy | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 2022 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- 6285894.pdf
- Size:
- 559.2 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Published version