The enhanced examination for professional practice in psychology: A viable approach?

dc.contributor.author

Callahan, Jennifer L

dc.contributor.author

Bell, Debora J

dc.contributor.author

Davila, Joanne

dc.contributor.author

Johnson, Sheri L

dc.contributor.author

Strauman, Timothy J

dc.contributor.author

Yee, Cindy M

dc.date.accessioned

2022-04-01T14:39:37Z

dc.date.available

2022-04-01T14:39:37Z

dc.date.issued

2020-01

dc.date.updated

2022-04-01T14:39:37Z

dc.description.abstract

Health disciplines have increasingly required competency-based evaluations as a licensure prerequisite. In keeping with this trend, the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) has begun to develop a second part to the Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP). The resulting 2-part examination is collectively referred to as the Enhanced EPPP. Part 1 of the Enhanced EPPP, which consists of the current exam, is designed to be an assessment of knowledge. Part 2 of the Enhanced EPPP is newly developed and intended to address the need for a competency-based evaluation. To date, ASPPB has addressed some standard facets of validity for the EPPP Part 2, but not others. In addition, the EPPP Part 2 has yet to be subjected to a broader validation process, in which the suitability of the test for its intended purpose is evaluated. Implementation of the EPPP Part 2 before validation could have negative consequences for those seeking to enter the profession and for the general public (e.g., potential restriction of diversity in the psychology workforce). For jurisdictions implementing the EPPP Part 2, failure to gather and report the evidence required for use of a test in a forensic context may also open the door for legal challenges. We end with suggestions for feasible research that could significantly enhance the validation process for the EPPP Part 2 and offer jurisdictions concrete suggestions of features to look for in determining whether and when to implement the Enhanced EPPP. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

dc.identifier

2019-81943-001

dc.identifier.issn

0003-066X

dc.identifier.issn

1935-990X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24770

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

dc.relation.ispartof

The American psychologist

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1037/amp0000586

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Psychology

dc.subject

Educational Measurement

dc.subject

Professional Practice

dc.title

The enhanced examination for professional practice in psychology: A viable approach?

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Strauman, Timothy J|0000-0002-0310-4505

pubs.begin-page

52

pubs.end-page

65

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Psychology and Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-UNC Center for Brain Imaging and Analysis

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

75

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020 Callahan et al American Psychologist article.pdf
Size:
619.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format