Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers (Preprint)
| dc.contributor.author | Adair, Kathryn C | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodriguez-Homs, Larissa G | |
| dc.contributor.author | Masoud, Sabran | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mosca, Paul J | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sexton, J Bryan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-01T14:00:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-01T14:00:09Z | |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-09-01T14:00:09Z | |
| dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND
Emotional exhaustion (EE) in health care workers is common and consequentially linked to lower quality of care. Effective interventions to address EE are urgently needed. OBJECTIVEThis randomized single-exposure trial examined the efficacy of a gratitude letter–writing intervention for improving health care workers’ well-being. METHODSA total of 1575 health care workers were randomly assigned to one of two gratitude letter–writing prompts (self- vs other focused) to assess differential efficacy. Assessments of EE, subjective happiness, work-life balance, and tool engagement were collected at baseline and 1-week post intervention. Participants received their EE score at baseline and quartile benchmarking scores. Paired-samples <i>t</i> tests, independent <i>t</i> tests, and correlations explored the efficacy of the intervention. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software assessed the linguistic content of the gratitude letters and associations with well-being. RESULTSParticipants in both conditions showed significant improvements in EE, happiness, and work-life balance between the intervention and 1-week follow-up (<i>P</i><.001). The self-focused (vs other) instruction conditions did not differentially predict improvement in any of the measures (<i>P</i>=.91). Tool engagement was high, and participants reporting higher motivation to improve their EE had higher EE at baseline (<i>P</i><.001) and were more likely to improve EE a week later (<i>P</i>=.03). Linguistic analyses revealed that participants high on EE at baseline used more negative emotion words in their letters (<i>P</i>=.005). Reduction in EE at the 1-week follow-up was predicted at the level of a trend by using fewer first-person (<i>P</i>=.06) and positive emotion words (<i>P</i>=.09). No baseline differences were found between those who completed the follow-up assessment and those who did not (<i>P</i>s>.05). CONCLUSIONSThis single-exposure gratitude letter–writing intervention appears to be a promising low-cost, brief, and meaningful tool to improve the well-being of health care workers. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | ||
| dc.publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.2196/preprints.15562 | |
| dc.title | Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers (Preprint) | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| duke.contributor.orcid | Adair, Kathryn C|0000-0003-4886-0002 | |
| duke.contributor.orcid | Masoud, Sabran|0000-0002-7758-3545 | |
| duke.contributor.orcid | Sexton, J Bryan|0000-0002-0578-2924 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Staff | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, General Psychiatry | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
| pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Duke Cancer Institute | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Surgical Oncology | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Centers | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Surgery |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- JMIR Gratitude at Work - Adair et al 2020.pdf
- Size:
- 287.86 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format