Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers (Preprint)

dc.contributor.author

Adair, Kathryn C

dc.contributor.author

Rodriguez-Homs, Larissa G

dc.contributor.author

Masoud, Sabran

dc.contributor.author

Mosca, Paul J

dc.contributor.author

Sexton, J Bryan

dc.date.accessioned

2021-09-01T14:00:09Z

dc.date.available

2021-09-01T14:00:09Z

dc.date.updated

2021-09-01T14:00:09Z

dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND

Emotional exhaustion (EE) in health care workers is common and consequentially linked to lower quality of care. Effective interventions to address EE are urgently needed.

OBJECTIVE

This randomized single-exposure trial examined the efficacy of a gratitude letter–writing intervention for improving health care workers’ well-being.

METHODS

A total of 1575 health care workers were randomly assigned to one of two gratitude letter–writing prompts (self- vs other focused) to assess differential efficacy. Assessments of EE, subjective happiness, work-life balance, and tool engagement were collected at baseline and 1-week post intervention. Participants received their EE score at baseline and quartile benchmarking scores. Paired-samples <i>t</i> tests, independent <i>t</i> tests, and correlations explored the efficacy of the intervention. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software assessed the linguistic content of the gratitude letters and associations with well-being.

RESULTS

Participants in both conditions showed significant improvements in EE, happiness, and work-life balance between the intervention and 1-week follow-up (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). The self-focused (vs other) instruction conditions did not differentially predict improvement in any of the measures (<i>P</i>=.91). Tool engagement was high, and participants reporting higher motivation to improve their EE had higher EE at baseline (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) and were more likely to improve EE a week later (<i>P</i>=.03). Linguistic analyses revealed that participants high on EE at baseline used more negative emotion words in their letters (<i>P</i>=.005). Reduction in EE at the 1-week follow-up was predicted at the level of a trend by using fewer first-person (<i>P</i>=.06) and positive emotion words (<i>P</i>=.09). No baseline differences were found between those who completed the follow-up assessment and those who did not (<i>P</i>s&gt;.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This single-exposure gratitude letter–writing intervention appears to be a promising low-cost, brief, and meaningful tool to improve the well-being of health care workers.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23678

dc.publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

dc.relation.isversionof

10.2196/preprints.15562

dc.title

Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers (Preprint)

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Adair, Kathryn C|0000-0003-4886-0002

duke.contributor.orcid

Masoud, Sabran|0000-0002-7758-3545

duke.contributor.orcid

Sexton, J Bryan|0000-0002-0578-2924

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, General Psychiatry

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Surgical Oncology

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JMIR Gratitude at Work - Adair et al 2020.pdf
Size:
287.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format