Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

dc.contributor.author

Whitehead, Evan H

dc.contributor.author

Thayer, Katherine L

dc.contributor.author

Burkhoff, Daniel

dc.contributor.author

Uriel, Nir

dc.contributor.author

Ohman, E Magnus

dc.contributor.author

O'Neill, William

dc.contributor.author

Kapur, Navin K

dc.date.accessioned

2021-06-01T16:55:44Z

dc.date.available

2021-06-01T16:55:44Z

dc.date.issued

2020-01

dc.date.updated

2021-06-01T16:55:43Z

dc.description.abstract

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is associated with increased mortality among patients receiving left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (LV-MCS) for cardiogenic shock and requires prompt recognition and management. Increased central venous pressure (CVP) is an indicator of potential RVF. Objectives: We studied whether elevated CVP during LV-MCS for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is associated with higher mortality. Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2019, we analyzed hemodynamic parameters during Impella LV-MCS from 28 centers in the United States participating in the global, prospective catheter-based ventricular assist device (cVAD) study. A total of 132 patients with a documented CVP measurement while on Impella left-sided support for cardiogenic shock were identified. Results: CVP was significantly higher among patients who died in the hospital (14.0 vs. 11.7 mmHg, p = 0.014), and a CVP >12 identified patients at significantly higher risk for in-hospital mortality (65 vs. 45%, p = 0.02). CVP remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality even after adjustment in a multivariable model (adjusted OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.02-1.19] per 1 mmHg increase). LV-MCS suction events were non-significantly more frequent among patients with high vs. low CVP (62.11 vs. 7.14 events, p = 0.067). Conclusion: CVP is a single, readily accessible hemodynamic parameter which predicts a higher rate of short-term mortality and may identify subclinical RVF in patients receiving LV-MCS for cardiogenic shock.

dc.identifier.issn

2297-055X

dc.identifier.issn

2297-055X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23309

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Frontiers Media SA

dc.relation.ispartof

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3389/fcvm.2020.00155

dc.subject

Impella RP

dc.subject

cardiogenic shock

dc.subject

central venous pressure

dc.subject

mechanical circulatory support

dc.subject

right heart failure

dc.title

Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

155

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

7

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Central Venous Pressure and Clinical Outcomes During Left-Sided Mechanical Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardi.pdf
Size:
429.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format