Assessing a Digital Medicine System in Veterans with Severe Mental Illness: A provider-randomized clinical trial (Preprint)

dc.contributor.author

Gonzales, Sarah

dc.contributor.author

Okusaga, Olaoluwa O

dc.contributor.author

Reuteman-Fowler, J Corey

dc.contributor.author

Oakes, Megan M

dc.contributor.author

Brown, Jamie N

dc.contributor.author

Moore, Scott

dc.contributor.author

Lewinski, Allison A

dc.contributor.author

Rodriguez, Cristin

dc.contributor.author

Moncayo, Norma

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Valerie A

dc.contributor.author

Malone, Shauna

dc.contributor.author

List, Justine

dc.contributor.author

Cho, Raymond Y

dc.contributor.author

Jeffreys, Amy S

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-02T20:16:13Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-02T20:16:13Z

dc.date.issued

2021-12-09

dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND

Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant problem for patients with serious mental illness (SMI). Measuring medication adherence through subjective and objective measures can be challenging, time consuming and inaccurate.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated a digital medicine system (DMS) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) on adherence to oral aripiprazole and patient and provider perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of a DMS.

METHODS

This open-label, 2-site, provider-randomized trial assessed aripiprazole refill adherence in Veterans with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. We randomized 26 providers such that their patients either received TAU or DMS for a period of 90 days. Semi-structured interviews with patients and providers were used to examine feasibility and acceptability of using the DMS.

RESULTS

We enrolled 46 patients across 2 Veterans Affairs (VA) sites: (21 in DMS and 25 in TAU). There was no difference in medication refill over 3 and 6 months, respectively (82% and 75% DMS vs. 86% and 82% TAU). The DMS arm had 85% days covered during the period they were engaged with the DMS (144 days on average). Interviews with patients (n=14) and providers (n=5) elicited themes salient to using the DMS. Patient themes included: pre-enrollment adherence strategies and interest in the DMS, positive impact on medication adherence, system usability challenges, support needs, and suggested design/functionality improvements. Provider themes included: concerns for patient medication adherence and interest in the DMS, concerns with the DMS, DMS dashboard usability, challenges of the DMS, and suggestions to increase provider use.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no observed difference in refill rates. Among those who engaged in the DMS arm, refill rates were relatively high (85%). The qualitative analyses highlighted areas for further refinement of the DMS.

CLINICALTRIAL

NCT03881449

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29631

dc.relation.isversionof

10.2196/preprints.34893

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.title

Assessing a Digital Medicine System in Veterans with Severe Mental Illness: A provider-randomized clinical trial (Preprint)

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Lewinski, Allison A|0000-0002-1356-1857

duke.contributor.orcid

Smith, Valerie A|0000-0001-5170-9819

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

School of Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
preprint-34893-submitted1.2.24_20.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format