An Experimental Investigation into the Scope Assignment of Japanese and Chinese Quantifier-Negation Sentences

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2024-03-01

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

7
views
21
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Quantifier-Negation sentences such as all teachers did not use Sandy’s car are known to allow an inverse scope interpretation in English. However, there is a lack of experimental evidence to determine whether this interpretation is allowed in equivalent sentences in Japanese and Chinese. To address this issue, this study conducted a sentence–picture matching truth value judgment experiment in both Japanese and Chinese. The data suggested that Japanese Quantifier-Negation sentences do allow inverse scope readings, which suggests that the subject may be interpreted within the scope of negation. In contrast, Chinese Quantifier-Negation sentences prohibit inverse scope readings, which is in accordance with the strong scope rigidity consistently observed in this language. This paper also discussed how to develop a valid experiment for investigating scope ambiguities.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3390/languages9030111

Publication Info

Chen, Y (2024). An Experimental Investigation into the Scope Assignment of Japanese and Chinese Quantifier-Negation Sentences. Languages, 9(3). pp. 111–111. 10.3390/languages9030111 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30687.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Chen

Yunchuan Chen

Assistant Professor of the Practice of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies

My research interests are experimental approaches to grammars, L2 acquisition and heritage languages. My research projects so far include Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Tibetan, Thai and Nuosu Yi. I am also interested in how to teach/learn foreign languages effectively with meaning-based approaches.  


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.