Oyster reefs as carbon sources and sinks.
Date
2017-07
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Carbon burial is increasingly valued as a service provided by threatened vegetated coastal habitats. Similarly, shellfish reefs contain significant pools of carbon and are globally endangered, yet considerable uncertainty remains regarding shellfish reefs' role as sources (+) or sinks (-) of atmospheric CO2 While CO2 release is a by-product of carbonate shell production (then burial), shellfish also facilitate atmospheric-CO2 drawdown via filtration and rapid biodeposition of carbon-fixing primary producers. We provide a framework to account for the dual burial of inorganic and organic carbon, and demonstrate that decade-old experimental reefs on intertidal sandflats were net sources of CO2 (7.1 ± 1.2 MgC ha-1 yr-1 (µ ± s.e.)) resulting from predominantly carbonate deposition, whereas shallow subtidal reefs (-1.0 ± 0.4 MgC ha-1 yr-1) and saltmarsh-fringing reefs (-1.3 ± 0.4 MgC ha-1 yr-1) were dominated by organic-carbon-rich sediments and functioned as net carbon sinks (on par with vegetated coastal habitats). These landscape-level differences reflect gradients in shellfish growth, survivorship and shell bioerosion. Notably, down-core carbon concentrations in 100- to 4000-year-old reefs mirrored experimental-reef data, suggesting our results are relevant over centennial to millennial scales, although we note that these natural reefs appeared to function as slight carbon sources (0.5 ± 0.3 MgC ha-1 yr-1). Globally, the historical mining of the top metre of shellfish reefs may have reintroduced more than 400 000 000 Mg of organic carbon into estuaries. Importantly, reef formation and destruction do not have reciprocal, counterbalancing impacts on atmospheric CO2 since excavated organic material may be remineralized while shell may experience continued preservation through reburial. Thus, protection of existing reefs could be considered as one component of climate mitigation programmes focused on the coastal zone.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Fodrie, F Joel, Antonio B Rodriguez, Rachel K Gittman, Jonathan H Grabowski, Niels L Lindquist, Charles H Peterson, Michael F Piehler, Justin T Ridge, et al. (2017). Oyster reefs as carbon sources and sinks. Proceedings. Biological sciences, 284(1859). p. 20170891. 10.1098/rspb.2017.0891 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/35374.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Joel Fodrie
Our laboratory group studies the population dynamics of fishes and shellfishes, as well as the community ecology of estuarine systems. Our team’s funded/published research has emphasized: (1) quantifying connectivity among marine populations and ecosystems; (2) understanding the long-term effects of pulse and press disturbances using coastal fishes as a model system; (3) exploring the natural history, restoration ecology, and climate response of coastal habitats such as oyster reefs and seagrass meadows; (4) investigating the landscape ecology of seagrass meadows; and (5) the ecosystem and socioeconomic dynamics of expanding shellfish mariculture operations. Since 2010, we have also served as the primary caretaker of the Cape Lookout long-term shark survey based out of the Institute of Marine Sciences. I have contributed ~115 peer-reviewed papers that explore mechanisms of population and community variability within coastal ecosystems. These articles appear in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Ecology, and BioScience. Over the last decade, our team has become increasingly engaged in coastal resource management in North Carolina.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.
