A survey-based study of wrong-level lumbar spine surgery: the scope of the problem and current practices in place to help avoid these errors.
dc.contributor.author | Groff, Michael W | |
dc.contributor.author | Heller, Joshua E | |
dc.contributor.author | Potts, Eric A | |
dc.contributor.author | Mummaneni, Praveen V | |
dc.contributor.author | Shaffrey, Christopher I | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Justin S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-30T00:01:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-30T00:01:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-03 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-08-30T00:01:04Z | |
dc.description.abstract | ObjectiveTo understand better the scope of wrong-level lumbar spine surgery and current practices in place to help avoid such errors.MethodsThe Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves (Spine Section) developed a survey on single-level lumbar spine decompression surgery. Invitations to complete the Web-based survey were sent to all Spine Section members. Respondents were assured of confidentiality.ResultsThere were 569 responses from 1045 requests (54%). Most surgeons either routinely (74%) or sometimes (11%) obtain preoperative imaging for incision planning. Most surgeons indicated that they obtained imaging after the incision was performed for localization either routinely before bone removal (73%) or most frequently before bone removal but occasionally after (16%). Almost 50% of reporting surgeons have performed wrong-level lumbar spine surgery at least once, and >10% have performed wrong-side lumbar spine surgery at least once. Nearly 20% of responding surgeons have been the subject of at least one malpractice case relating to these errors. Only 40% of respondents believed that the site marking/"time out" protocol of The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has led to a reduction in these errors.ConclusionsThere is substantial heterogeneity in approaches used to localize operative levels in the lumbar spine. Existing safety protocols may not be mitigating wrong-level surgery to the extent previously thought. | |
dc.identifier | S1878-8750(12)00435-4 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1878-8750 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1878-8769 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | |
dc.relation.ispartof | World neurosurgery | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.017 | |
dc.subject | Lumbosacral Region | |
dc.subject | Spine | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Spinal Diseases | |
dc.subject | Fluoroscopy | |
dc.subject | Orthopedic Procedures | |
dc.subject | Intraoperative Care | |
dc.subject | Decompression, Surgical | |
dc.subject | Neurosurgical Procedures | |
dc.subject | Diskectomy | |
dc.subject | Health Care Surveys | |
dc.subject | Malpractice | |
dc.subject | Medical Errors | |
dc.subject | United States | |
dc.title | A survey-based study of wrong-level lumbar spine surgery: the scope of the problem and current practices in place to help avoid these errors. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386 | |
pubs.begin-page | 585 | |
pubs.end-page | 592 | |
pubs.issue | 3-4 | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.organisational-group | Orthopaedic Surgery | |
pubs.organisational-group | Neurosurgery | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 79 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- 1-s2.0-S1878875012004354-main.pdf
- Size:
- 1.42 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format