Myelography Using Energy-Integrating Detector CT Versus Photon-Counting Detector CT for Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas in Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.

Abstract

Background: CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs) are an increasingly recognized cause of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) that are often diminutive in size and exceedingly difficult to detect by conventional imaging. Objective: This study's objective was to compare EID-CT myelography and PCD-CT myelography in terms of image quality and diagnostic performance for detecting CVFs in patients with SIH. Methods: This retrospective study included 38 patients (15 men, 23 women; mean age, 55±10 years) with SIH who underwent both clinically indicated EID-CT myelography (slice thickness, 0.625 mm) and PCD-CT myelography (slice thickness, 0.2 mm; performed in ultrahigh-resolution mode) to assess for CSF leak. Three blinded radiologists reviewed examinations in random order, assessing image noise, discernibility of spinal nerve root sleeves, and overall image quality using 0-100 scales (100=highest quality), and recording locations of CVFs. Definite CVFs were defined as CVFs described in CT myelography reports using unequivocal language and showing attenuation >70 HU. Results: For all readers, PCD-CT myelography, in comparison with EID-CT myelography, showed higher image noise (reader 1: 69±19 vs 38±15; reader 2: 59±9 vs 49±13; reader 3: 57±13 vs 43±15), higher nerve root sleeve discernibility (reader 1: 84±19 vs 30±14; reader 2: 84±19 vs 70±19; reader 3: 60±13 vs 52±12), and higher overall image quality (reader 1: 84±21 vs 40±15; reader 2: 81±10 vs 72±20; reader 3: 58±11 vs 53±11) (all p<.05). Eleven patients had a definite CVF. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of definite CVF for EID-CT myelography and PCD-CT myelography for reader 1 were 45% and 96% versus 64% and 85; for reader 2 were 36% and 100% versus 55% and 96%; and for reader 3 were 45% and 100% versus 55% and 93%. For all readers, PCD-CT myelography, in comparison with EID-CT myelography, showed significantly higher sensitivity (all p<.05), without significant difference in specificity (all p>.05). Conclusion: In comparison with EID-CT myelography, PCD-CT myelography yielded significantly improved image quality with significantly higher sensitivity for CVFs without significant loss of specificity. Clinical Impact: The findings support a potential role of PCD-CT myelography in facilitating earlier diagnosis and targeted treatment of SIH, avoiding high morbidity during potentially prolonged diagnostic workups.