The Use of Advanced Semiautomated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus.

dc.contributor.author

de Carvalho, Kepler Alencar Mendes

dc.contributor.author

Mallavarapu, Vineel

dc.contributor.author

Ehret, Amanda

dc.contributor.author

Dibbern, Kevin

dc.contributor.author

Lee, Hee Young

dc.contributor.author

Barbachan Mansur, Nacime Salomao

dc.contributor.author

Laleveé, Matthieu

dc.contributor.author

de Cesar Netto, Cesar

dc.date.accessioned

2023-05-31T03:43:28Z

dc.date.available

2023-05-31T03:43:28Z

dc.date.issued

2022-10

dc.date.updated

2023-05-31T03:43:26Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) measurements allow evaluation of several anatomical points for a correct clinical-radiographic diagnosis of pathologies, such as hallux rigidus (HR). In addition, a new semiautomatic segmentation software obtains automated 3D measurements from WBCT scan data sets, minimizing errors in reading angular measurements. The study's objective was (1) to evaluate the reliability of WBCT semiautomatic imaging measures in HR, (2) to evaluate correlation and agreement between manual and semiautomatic measures in the setting of HR, and (3) to compare semiautomatic measurements between pathologic (HR) and standard control groups.

Methods

A retrospective study of HR patients was performed including 20 feet with HR. WBCT manual and semiautomatic 3D measurements were performed using the following parameters: (1) first metatarsal-proximal phalanx angle (1stMPP), (2) hallux valgus angle (HVA), (3) first to second intermetatarsal angle (IMA), (4) hallux interphalangeal angle (IPA), (5) first metatarsal length (1stML), (6) second metatarsal length (2ndML), (7) first metatarsal declination angle (1stMD), (8) second metatarsal declination angles (2ndMD), and (9) metatarsus primus elevatus (MPE). The differences between pathologic and control cases were assessed with a Wilcoxon test.

Results

Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for manual vs semiautomatic WBCT measurements demonstrated excellent reliability. According to the Pearson coefficient, there was a strong positive linear correlation between both methods for the following parameters evaluated: HVA (ρ = 0.96), IMA (ρ = 0.86), IPA (ρ = 0.89), 1stML (ρ = 0.96), 2ndML (ρ = 0.91), 1stMD (ρ = 0.86), 2ndMD (ρ = 0.95), and MPE (ρ = 0.87). Comparison between the pathologic group with HR and the control (standard) group allowed for the differentiating of the pathologic (HR) from the non-pathologic conditions for MPE (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Semiautomatic measurements are reproducible and comparable to measurements performed manually, showing excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement. The software used differentiated pathologic from nonpathologic conditions when submitted to semiautomatic MPE measurements.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.
dc.identifier

10.1177_24730114221137597

dc.identifier.issn

2473-0114

dc.identifier.issn

2473-0114

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/27421

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Foot & ankle orthopaedics

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/24730114221137597

dc.subject

Hallux rigidus

dc.subject

WBCT

dc.subject

automatic

dc.subject

deformity

dc.subject

intermetatarsal angles

dc.subject

manual

dc.subject

measurements

dc.subject

segmentation

dc.subject

three-dimensional

dc.title

The Use of Advanced Semiautomated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

de Cesar Netto, Cesar|0000-0001-6037-0685

pubs.begin-page

24730114221137597

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

7

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The Use of Advanced Semiautomated Bone Segmentation in Hallux Rigidus.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version