‘Rigid demand’: Economic imagination and practice in China’s urban housing market

Loading...

Date

2018-05

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

8
views
13
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

<jats:p> China’s socialist market economy is predominated by strong state-owned sectors. In the real estate market, the government further controls land and regulates social services based on property ownership. But how do ordinary market actors perceive this configuration and strategise their economic practice accordingly? Based on 20 months of ethnographic fieldwork, this article explores buyers’ and estate agents’ imagination of and practice in the housing market with a focus on the folk concept of rigid demand. Rigid demand (gangxu) refers to the belief that people have to buy a home regardless of price. Presenting how people invoke a range of referents and contexts when talking about rigid demand, I show that common Chinese market actors understand and approach the housing market not as an end in itself but as a mechanism devised and maneuvered by big market players such as the government and developers. Furthermore, actors believe that the market has a social purpose and is susceptible to agentive interventions. Ultimately, I argue that the social representation of the socialist housing market constructs and contests the legitimacy of certain economic practices and influences market performance accordingly. </jats:p>

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1177/0042098017747511

Publication Info

Wang, Mengqi (2018). ‘Rigid demand’: Economic imagination and practice in China’s urban housing market. Urban Studies, 55(7). pp. 1579–1594. 10.1177/0042098017747511 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/32442.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Wang

Mengqi Wang

Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Duke Kunshan University

I am a cultural anthropologist based at Duke Kunshan University. My primary research interests include economic anthropology, urban anthropology, political economy, the social studies of the market, science and technology studies, housing, urban studies, and China. From 2012 to 2019, I conducted long-term ethnographic fieldwork tracing the development of a low-end housing market at the urban fringe of east Nanjing, southeast China (long-term stay from 2013 to 2015, short field trips conducted in 2012 and 2019). In the field, I followed government officials, developers, realtors, and homebuyers and sellers to study how diverse actors built the local housing market from the bottom up. I am particularly interested in how certain economic concepts help to bring actors together and allow for capital accumulation in the urban process. 

The project produced several articles published on peer-reviewed journals such as Positions: Asia Critique, the Journal of Cultural Economy, and Urban Studies. In these articles, I explored the valuation of rural estate in land assembly and resettlement projects, the temporal orchestration of home presales, and the dominant narratives that brought diverse actors together to bring the market into existence at Nanjing's urban periphery. 

My book, entitled Anxious Homes: Inflexible Demand and China's Housing Market (forthcoming, Cornell University Press, 2026), analyses China's real estate economy through the lens of 刚需/gangxu, a vernacular concept that the government, developers, realtors, and lower-middle class homebuyers in China draw on to refer to—and construct—an inflexible demand for homeownership as an indispensable criterion for fulfilling dreams of urban citizenship. Through an ethnography of a low-end housing market in east Nanjing’s urban fringe, Anxious Homes shows how such claims of homeownership as an inflexible demand have helped to bring the current market for housing, and China’s ongoing real estate crisis, into existence. It explains how China’s real estate market, constructed under state ownership of land and dominated by the growth coalition between the urban government and the developer, leverages enormous resources from the population in unsustainable ways. The book also explores how resultant ideologies of homeownership allow various actors to make sense of urban growth under conditions of market socialism. It argues that, in urban China, diverse actors’ assertions of the value of the home have given rise to new forms of capitalist exploitation, citizenship entitlements, class aspirations, and gendered politics that have culminated in the formation of China’s debt-financed, infrastructure-driven growth model, whose ascendancy and collapse are felt throughout the world.

In September 2021, China’s top developer, Evergrande, made headlines worldwide for facing over $300 billion worth of financial liability. News of Evergrande’s debt problems marked the beginning of the country’s ongoing real estate crisis. As more defaults continued to emerge since then, China’s national economy slowed down, fueling discontent towards the Communist Party, and sending ripple effect throughout the world financial system. My most recent ethnographic research looks into developers' defaults. I am particularly interested in how developers' defaults halted constructions of homes that had already been sold to lower-middle class buyers, and how ruination serves as a means of accumulation in times of debt crisis. Preliminary findings from this research is scheduled to be presented at the 2023 Annual Conference of American Anthropologists in Toronto.  


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.