Reply to Safra et al.: Lack of theoretical rationale and selective analysis does not imply no strong evidence.

dc.contributor.author	Kakkar, Hemant
dc.contributor.author	Sivanathan, Niro
dc.date.accessioned	2019-09-06T01:15:59Z
dc.date.available	2019-09-06T01:15:59Z
dc.date.issued	2018-02
dc.date.updated	2019-09-06T01:15:58Z
dc.identifier	1722116115
dc.identifier.issn	0027-8424
dc.identifier.issn	1091-6490
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19292
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
dc.relation.ispartof	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
dc.relation.isversionof	10.1073/pnas.1722116115
dc.subject	Science & Technology
dc.subject	Multidisciplinary Sciences
dc.subject	Science & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subject	COMPENSATORY CONTROL
dc.subject	BELIEF
dc.subject	GOD
dc.title	Reply to Safra et al.: Lack of theoretical rationale and selective analysis does not imply no strong evidence.
dc.type	Journal article
pubs.begin-page	E1078
pubs.end-page	E1079
pubs.issue	6
pubs.organisational-group	Fuqua School of Business
pubs.organisational-group	Duke
pubs.publication-status	Published
pubs.volume	115

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1