Hospital discharge communications during care transitions for patients with acute kidney injury: a cross-sectional study.

dc.contributor.author

Greer, Raquel C

dc.contributor.author

Liu, Yang

dc.contributor.author

Crews, Deidra C

dc.contributor.author

Jaar, Bernard G

dc.contributor.author

Rabb, Hamid

dc.contributor.author

Boulware, L Ebony

dc.coverage.spatial

England

dc.date.accessioned

2017-10-13T01:35:33Z

dc.date.available

2017-10-13T01:35:33Z

dc.date.issued

2016-08-30

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: High quality hospital discharge communications about acute kidney injury (AKI) could facilitate continuity of care after hospital transitions and reduce patients' post-hospitalization health risks. METHODS: We characterized the presence and quality (10 elements) of written hospital discharge communications (physician discharge summaries and patient instructions) for patients hospitalized with AKI at a single institution in 2012 through medical record review. RESULTS: In 75 randomly selected hospitalized patients with AKI, fewer than half of physician discharge summaries and patient instructions documented the presence (n = 33, 44 % and n = 10, 13 %, respectively), cause (n = 32, 43 % and n = 1, 1 %, respectively), or course of AKI (n = 23, 31 %, discharge summary only) during hospitalization. Few provided recommendations for treatment and/or observation specific to AKI (n = 11, 15 and 6, 8 % respectively). In multivariable analyses, discharge communications containing information about AKI were most prevalent among patients with AKI Stage 3, followed by patients with Stage 2 and Stage 1 (adjusted percentages (AP) [95 % CI]: 84 % [39-98 %], 43 % [11-82 %], and 24 % [reference], respectively; p trend = 0.008). AKI discharge communications were also more prevalent among patients with known chronic kidney disease (CKD) versus those without (AP [95 % CI]: 92 % [51-99 %] versus 39 % [reference], respectively, p = 0.02) and among patients discharged from medical versus surgical services (AP [95 % CI]: 73 % [33-93 %] versus 23 % [reference], respectively, p = 0.01). Communications featured 4 median quality elements. Quality elements were greater in communications for patients with more severe AKI (Stage 3 (number of additional quality elements (β) [95 % CI]: 2.29 [0.87-3.72]), Stage 2 (β [95 % CI]: 0.62 [-0.65-1.90]) and Stage 1 (reference); p for trend = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Few hospital discharge communications in AKI patients described AKI or provided recommendations for AKI care. Improvements in the quality of hospital discharge communications to improve care transitions of patients with AKI are needed.

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577888

dc.identifier

10.1186/s12913-016-1697-7

dc.identifier.eissn

1472-6963

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15632

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

BMC Health Serv Res

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1186/s12913-016-1697-7

dc.subject

Acute kidney injury

dc.subject

Hospitalizations

dc.subject

Transitions of care

dc.title

Hospital discharge communications during care transitions for patients with acute kidney injury: a cross-sectional study.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Boulware, L Ebony|0000-0002-8650-4212

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577888

pubs.begin-page

449

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Community and Family Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published online

pubs.volume

16

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hospital discharge communications during care transitions for patients with acute kidney injury: a cross-sectional study.pdf
Size:
532.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format