Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the southeastern United States: an assessment of how clinicians reached the diagnosis.

dc.contributor.author

Gu, Jessie P

dc.contributor.author

Tsai, Chen-Liang

dc.contributor.author

Wysham, Nicholas G

dc.contributor.author

Huang, Yuh-Chin T

dc.date.accessioned

2020-04-01T13:20:21Z

dc.date.available

2020-04-01T13:20:21Z

dc.date.issued

2020-02-05

dc.date.updated

2020-04-01T13:20:19Z

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND:Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) is a disease caused by exposure to inhaled environmental antigens. Diagnosis of cHP is influenced by the awareness of the disease prevalence, which varies significantly in different regions, and how clinicians utilize relevant clinical information. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate how clinicians in the Southeast United States, where the climate is humid favoring mold growth, diagnosed cHP using items identified in the international modified Delphi survey of experts, i.e., environmental exposure, CT imaging and lung pathology, METHODS: We searched Duke University Medical Center database for patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of cHP (ICD-9 code: 495) between Jan. 1, 2008 to Dec. 31, 2013 using a query tool, Duke Enterprise Data Unified Content Explorer (DEDUCE). RESULTS:Five hundred patients were identified and 261 patients had cHP confirmed in clinic notes by a pulmonologist or an allergist. About half of the patients lived in the Research Triangle area where our medical center is located, giving an estimated prevalence rate of 6.5 per 100,000 persons. An exposure source was mentioned in 69.3% of the patient. The most common exposure sources were environmental molds (43.1%) and birds (26.0%). We used Venn diagram to evaluate how the patients met the three most common cHP diagnostic criteria: evidence of environmental exposures (history or precipitin) (E), chest CT imaging (C) and pathology from lung biopsies (P). Eighteen patients (6.9%) met none of three criteria. Of the remaining 243 patients, 135 patients (55.6%) had one (E 35.0%, C 3.3%, P 17.3%), 81 patients (33.3%) had two (E + C 12.3%, E + P 17.3%, C + P 4.9%), and 27 patients (11.1%) had all three criteria (E + C + P). Overall, 49.4% of patients had pathology from lung biopsy compared to 31.6% with CT scan. CONCLUSIONS:Environmental mold was the most common exposure for cHP in the Southeast United States. Lung pathology was available in more than half of cHP cases in our tertiary care center, perhaps reflecting the complexity of referrals. Differences in exposure sources and referral patterns should be considered in devising future diagnostic pathways or guidelines for cHP.

dc.identifier

10.1186/s12890-020-1072-7

dc.identifier.issn

1471-2466

dc.identifier.issn

1471-2466

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20285

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

BMC pulmonary medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1186/s12890-020-1072-7

dc.subject

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

dc.subject

Diagnosis

dc.subject

Exposure

dc.title

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the southeastern United States: an assessment of how clinicians reached the diagnosis.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Gu, Jessie P|0000-0001-7396-7608

pubs.begin-page

32

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

20

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the southeastern United States an assessment of how clinicians reached the diagnosis.pdf
Size:
1019.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version