The Clinical Impact of Global Coronal Malalignment Is Underestimated in Adult Patients With Thoracolumbar Scoliosis

dc.contributor.author

Plais, N

dc.contributor.author

Bao, H

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, R

dc.contributor.author

Gupta, M

dc.contributor.author

Smith, JS

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, C

dc.contributor.author

Mundis, G

dc.contributor.author

Burton, D

dc.contributor.author

Ames, C

dc.contributor.author

Klineberg, E

dc.contributor.author

Bess, S

dc.contributor.author

Schwab, F

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, V

dc.date.accessioned

2023-06-20T15:29:22Z

dc.date.available

2023-06-20T15:29:22Z

dc.date.issued

2019-01-01

dc.date.updated

2023-06-20T15:29:22Z

dc.description.abstract

Study Design: Retrospective review of multicenter adult spine deformity (ASD) database. Objectives: A recent publication demonstrated that the laterality of the coronal offset is a key parameter that directly impacts postoperative outcomes. The objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between global coronal malalignment (GCM) and functional outcomes in a North American population of ASD patients with no history of previous surgery. Summary of Background Data: The clinical impact of GCM in patients with ASD remains controversial. Methods: Primary patients were drawn from a multicenter database of ASD patients and categorized with the Qiu classification: Type A = GCM <3 cm; Type B = GCM >3 cm toward the concave side of the curve; and Type C = GCM >3 cm toward the convex side. In addition to the classic radiographic parameter, the coronal truncal inclination was investigated in regard to the pelvic obliquity. Clinical outcomes, radiographic parameters, and demographics were compared across the three Qiu Types using analysis of variance. The analysis was repeated after propensity matching of the three types by age and sagittal alignment (PI-LL mismatch, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis). Results: 576 ASD patients (mean age 58.8 years) were included. Type B patients had significantly worse functional scores (Oswestry Disability Index, 36-item Short Form Survey physical component summary, and Scoliosis Research Society–22) and a more severe coronal deformity in terms of maximum Cobb angle, global coronal deformity angle, and coronal malalignment; they were also older (65.4 vs. 58.8 years, p = .004) and displayed more severe sagittal malalignment. Similar findings were observed after propensity matching. Conclusions: This study is the first to establish an association between functional outcomes and the severity of the coronal plane deformity in the setting of a specific coronal curve pattern in patients without previous surgery. Coronal malalignment significantly affects the health status of patients when the offset is greater than 3 cm in the direction of curve concavity. Level of Evidence: Level III.

dc.identifier.issn

2212-134X

dc.identifier.issn

2212-1358

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28226

dc.relation.ispartof

Spine Deformity

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.jspd.2019.05.004

dc.title

The Clinical Impact of Global Coronal Malalignment Is Underestimated in Adult Patients With Thoracolumbar Scoliosis

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, C|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The Clinical Impact of Global Coronal Malalignment Is Underestimated in Adult Patients With Thoracolumbar Scoliosis.pdf
Size:
939.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format