Systematic Review: Emotion Dysregulation in Syndromic Causes of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

dc.contributor.author

Shaffer, Rebecca C

dc.contributor.author

Reisinger, Debra L

dc.contributor.author

Schmitt, Lauren M

dc.contributor.author

Lamy, Martine

dc.contributor.author

Dominick, Kelli C

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Elizabeth G

dc.contributor.author

Coffman, Marika C

dc.contributor.author

Esbensen, Anna J

dc.date.accessioned

2023-02-01T16:18:24Z

dc.date.available

2023-02-01T16:18:24Z

dc.date.issued

2022-08

dc.date.updated

2023-02-01T16:18:23Z

dc.description.abstract

Objective

To summarize the current state of the literature regarding emotion dysregulation (ED) in syndromic intellectual disabilities (S-IDs) in 6 of the most common forms of S-IDs-Down syndrome, fragile X syndrome (FXS), tuberous sclerosis complex, Williams syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Angelman syndrome-and to determine future research directions for identification and treatment of ED.

Method

PubMed bibliographic database was searched from date of inception to May 2021. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed with the flowchart, table of included studies, list of excluded studies, and checklist provided. Filters applied included human research and English. Only original research articles were included in the final set, but review articles were used to identify secondary citations of primary studies. All articles were reviewed for appropriateness by 2 authors and summarized. Inclusion criteria were met by 145 articles (Down syndrome = 29, FXS = 55, tuberous sclerosis complex = 11, Williams syndrome = 18, Prader-Willi syndrome = 24, Angelman syndrome = 8).

Results

Each syndrome review was summarized separately and further subdivided into articles related to underlying neurobiology, behaviors associated with ED, assessment, and targeted intervention. FXS had the most thorough research base, followed by Down syndrome and Prader-Willi syndrome, with the other syndromes having more limited available research. Very limited research was available regarding intervention for all disorders except FXS.

Conclusion

Core underlying characteristics of S-IDs appear to place youth at higher risk for ED, but further research is needed to better assess and treat ED in S-IDs. Future studies should have a standard assessment measure of ED, such as the Emotion Dysregulation Inventory, and explore adapting established curricula for ED from the neurotypical and autism spectrum disorder fields.
dc.identifier

S0890-8567(22)01248-5

dc.identifier.issn

0890-8567

dc.identifier.issn

1527-5418

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26526

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.jaac.2022.06.020

dc.subject

Down syndrome

dc.subject

Williams syndrome

dc.subject

emotion dysregulation

dc.subject

fragile X syndrome

dc.subject

intellectual disability

dc.title

Systematic Review: Emotion Dysregulation in Syndromic Causes of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

S0890-8567(22)01248-5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry, Child & Family Mental Health & Community Psychiatry

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shaffer_Review of ID_JAACAP_2022.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version