Scientific evidence versus outdated beliefs: A response to Brewin (2016).

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016-10

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

106
views
70
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

We find Brewin's (2016) critiques of the narratives, power, and coherence measures in Rubin et al. (2016) without merit; his suggestions for a "revised formulation" (p. 1015) of coherence are contradicted by data readily available in the target article but ignored. We place Brewin's commentary in a historical context and show that it reiterates views of trauma memory fragmentation that are unsupported by data. We evaluate an earlier review of fragmentation of trauma memories (Brewin, 2014), which Brewin uses to support his position in the commentary. We show that it is contradicted by more comprehensive reviews and fails to include several studies that met Brewin's inclusion criteria but provided no support for his position, including 3 studies by the present authors (Rubin, 2011; Rubin, Boals, & Berntsen, 2008; Rubin, Dennis, & Beckham, 2011). In short, the commentary's position does not stand against scientific evidence; attempts to rescue it through arguments unsupported by data advance neither science nor clinical practice. (PsycINFO Database Record

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1037/abn0000211

Publication Info

Rubin, David C, Dorthe Berntsen, Christin M Ogle, Samantha A Deffler and Jean C Beckham (2016). Scientific evidence versus outdated beliefs: A response to Brewin (2016). Journal of abnormal psychology, 125(7). pp. 1018–1021. 10.1037/abn0000211 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19029.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.