Follow-up of patients with new cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: are experts' recommendations implemented in routine clinical practice?

dc.contributor.author

Al-Khatib, Sana M

dc.contributor.author

Mi, Xiaojuan

dc.contributor.author

Wilkoff, Bruce L

dc.contributor.author

Qualls, Laura G

dc.contributor.author

Frazier-Mills, Camille

dc.contributor.author

Setoguchi, Soko

dc.contributor.author

Hess, Paul L

dc.contributor.author

Curtis, Lesley H

dc.date.accessioned

2024-04-04T21:58:58Z

dc.date.available

2024-04-04T21:58:58Z

dc.date.issued

2013-02

dc.description.abstract

Background

A 2008 expert consensus statement outlined the minimum frequency of follow-up of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

Methods and results

We studied 38 055 Medicare beneficiaries who received a new CIED between January 1, 2005, and June 30, 2009. The main outcome measure was variation of follow-up by patient factors and year of device implantation. We determined the number of patients who were eligible for and attended an in-person CIED follow-up visit within 2 to 12 weeks, 0 to 16 weeks, and 1 year after implantation. Among eligible patients, 42.4% had an initial in-person visit within 2 to 12 weeks. This visit was significantly more common among white patients than black patients and patients of other races (43.0% versus 36.8% versus 40.5%; P<0.001). Follow-up within 2 to 12 weeks improved from 40.3% in 2005 to 55.1% in 2009 (P<0.001 for trend). The rate of follow-up within 0 to 16 weeks was 65.1% and improved considerably from 2005 to 2009 (62.3%-79.6%; P<0.001 for trend). Within 1 year, 78.0% of the overall population had at least 1 in-person CIED follow-up visit.

Conclusions

Although most Medicare beneficiaries who received a new CIED between 2005 and 2009 did not have an initial in-person CIED follow-up visit within 2 to 12 weeks after device implantation, the rate of initial follow-up improved appreciably over time. This CIED follow-up visit was significantly more common in white patients than in patients of other races.
dc.identifier

CIRCEP.112.974337

dc.identifier.issn

1941-3149

dc.identifier.issn

1941-3084

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30482

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1161/circep.112.974337

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Electric Countershock

dc.subject

Aftercare

dc.subject

Chi-Square Distribution

dc.subject

Follow-Up Studies

dc.subject

Equipment Design

dc.subject

Defibrillators, Implantable

dc.subject

Time Factors

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Aged, 80 and over

dc.subject

Medicare

dc.subject

Continuity of Patient Care

dc.subject

Guideline Adherence

dc.subject

United States

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Practice Guidelines as Topic

dc.subject

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

dc.subject

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices

dc.subject

Practice Patterns, Physicians'

dc.subject

White People

dc.subject

Black or African American

dc.title

Follow-up of patients with new cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: are experts' recommendations implemented in routine clinical practice?

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Al-Khatib, Sana M|0000-0002-3561-0146

duke.contributor.orcid

Curtis, Lesley H|0000-0002-3286-9371

pubs.begin-page

108

pubs.end-page

116

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

University Initiatives & Academic Support Units

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Follow-up of patients with new cardiovascular implantable electronic devices are experts recommendations implemented in rout.pdf
Size:
829.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format