RCN4GSC Workshop Report: Managing Data at the Interface of Biodiversity and (Meta)Genomics, March 2011.

dc.contributor.author

Robbins, Robert J

dc.contributor.author

Amaral-Zettler, Linda

dc.contributor.author

Bik, Holly

dc.contributor.author

Blum, Stan

dc.contributor.author

Edwards, James

dc.contributor.author

Field, Dawn

dc.contributor.author

Garrity, George

dc.contributor.author

Gilbert, Jack A

dc.contributor.author

Kottmann, Renzo

dc.contributor.author

Krishtalka, Leonard

dc.contributor.author

Lapp, Hilmar

dc.contributor.author

Lawrence, Carolyn

dc.contributor.author

Morrison, Norman

dc.contributor.author

Tuama, Eamonn Ó

dc.contributor.author

Parr, Cynthia

dc.contributor.author

San Gil, Inigo

dc.contributor.author

Schindel, David

dc.contributor.author

Schriml, Lynn

dc.contributor.author

Vieglas, David

dc.contributor.author

Wooley, John

dc.coverage.spatial

England

dc.date.accessioned

2015-05-27T17:59:52Z

dc.date.issued

2012-10-10

dc.description.abstract

Building on the planning efforts of the RCN4GSC project, a workshop was convened in San Diego to bring together experts from genomics and metagenomics, biodiversity, ecology, and bioinformatics with the charge to identify potential for positive interactions and progress, especially building on successes at establishing data standards by the GSC and by the biodiversity and ecological communities. Until recently, the contribution of microbial life to the biomass and biodiversity of the biosphere was largely overlooked (because it was resistant to systematic study). Now, emerging genomic and metagenomic tools are making investigation possible. Initial research findings suggest that major advances are in the offing. Although different research communities share some overlapping concepts and traditions, they differ significantly in sampling approaches, vocabularies and workflows. Likewise, their definitions of 'fitness for use' for data differ significantly, as this concept stems from the specific research questions of most importance in the different fields. Nevertheless, there is little doubt that there is much to be gained from greater coordination and integration. As a first step toward interoperability of the information systems used by the different communities, participants agreed to conduct a case study on two of the leading data standards from the two formerly disparate fields: (a) GSC's standard checklists for genomics and metagenomics and (b) TDWG's Darwin Core standard, used primarily in taxonomy and systematic biology.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451294

dc.identifier

sigs.3156511

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10190

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Stand Genomic Sci

dc.relation.isversionof

10.4056/sigs.3156511

dc.title

RCN4GSC Workshop Report: Managing Data at the Interface of Biodiversity and (Meta)Genomics, March 2011.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Lapp, Hilmar|0000-0001-9107-0714

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23451294

pubs.begin-page

159

pubs.end-page

165

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

7

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
RCN4GSC Workshop Report: Managing Data at the Interface of Biodiversity and (Meta)Genomics, March 2011..pdf
Size:
216.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version