New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems

Loading...

Date

2020-09-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

2
views
1
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

Mobilization efforts by parties and candidates during election campaigns tend to reach those who are more likely to vote in the first place. This is thought to be particularly consequential for turnout among the young. Harder and less cost-effective to reach, young adults are less mobilized and vote less often, creating a vicious circle of demobilization. However, new forms of political communication—including online and text messaging—have created expectations this circle might be broken. Is this happening? We examine data from Module 4 of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems surveys, looking at the prevalence of different types of party contacts in 38 countries, the profile of voters who are reached, and the effects of these efforts on turnout. New forms of party contacting do matter for turnout and partially reduce the age gap in contacting, but still fail to compensate for the much larger differentials that persist in traditional forms of contacting.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

mobilization, party contacts, turnout

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1177/1354068818797367

Publication Info

Magalhães, PC, JH Aldrich and RK Gibson (2020). New forms of mobilization, new people mobilized? Evidence from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Party Politics, 26(5). pp. 605–618. 10.1177/1354068818797367 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34932.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Aldrich

John Aldrich

Pfizer, Inc./Edmund T. Pratt, Jr. University Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Political Science

The Pfizer-Pratt University Professor of Political Science, John Aldrich specializes in American politics and behavior, formal theory, and methodology.

 

Books he has authored or co-authored include Why Parties; Why Parties Matter; Before the Convention; Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models; Interdisciplinarity: Its Role in a Discipline-based Academy and a series of books on elections, the most recent of which is Change and Continuity in the 2020 Elections.

 

His articles have appeared in the American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Public Choice, and other journals and edited volumes.

 

He has received grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities, and has served as co-editor of the American Journal of Political Science and as a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences and the Rockefeller Center, Bellagio, Italy. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

 

He has served as President of the Southern Political Science association, Midwest Political Science Association, and the American Political Science Association.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.