The fishery performance indicators: a management tool for triple bottom line outcomes.

dc.contributor.author

Anderson, James L

dc.contributor.author

Anderson, Christopher M

dc.contributor.author

Chu, Jingjie

dc.contributor.author

Meredith, Jennifer

dc.contributor.author

Asche, Frank

dc.contributor.author

Sylvia, Gil

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Martin D

dc.contributor.author

Anggraeni, Dessy

dc.contributor.author

Arthur, Robert

dc.contributor.author

Guttormsen, Atle

dc.contributor.author

McCluney, Jessica K

dc.contributor.author

Ward, Tim

dc.contributor.author

Akpalu, Wisdom

dc.contributor.author

Eggert, Håkan

dc.contributor.author

Flores, Jimely

dc.contributor.author

Freeman, Matthew A

dc.contributor.author

Holland, Daniel S

dc.contributor.author

Knapp, Gunnar

dc.contributor.author

Kobayashi, Mimako

dc.contributor.author

Larkin, Sherry

dc.contributor.author

MacLauchlin, Kari

dc.contributor.author

Schnier, Kurt

dc.contributor.author

Soboil, Mark

dc.contributor.author

Tveteras, Sigbjorn

dc.contributor.author

Uchida, Hirotsugu

dc.contributor.author

Valderrama, Diego

dc.contributor.editor

Tserpes, George

dc.coverage.spatial

United States

dc.date.accessioned

2017-01-21T22:41:21Z

dc.date.issued

2015

dc.description.abstract

Pursuit of the triple bottom line of economic, community and ecological sustainability has increased the complexity of fishery management; fisheries assessments require new types of data and analysis to guide science-based policy in addition to traditional biological information and modeling. We introduce the Fishery Performance Indicators (FPIs), a broadly applicable and flexible tool for assessing performance in individual fisheries, and for establishing cross-sectional links between enabling conditions, management strategies and triple bottom line outcomes. Conceptually separating measures of performance, the FPIs use 68 individual outcome metrics--coded on a 1 to 5 scale based on expert assessment to facilitate application to data poor fisheries and sectors--that can be partitioned into sector-based or triple-bottom-line sustainability-based interpretative indicators. Variation among outcomes is explained with 54 similarly structured metrics of inputs, management approaches and enabling conditions. Using 61 initial fishery case studies drawn from industrial and developing countries around the world, we demonstrate the inferential importance of tracking economic and community outcomes, in addition to resource status.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946194

dc.identifier

PONE-D-14-37986

dc.identifier.eissn

1932-6203

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13501

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

dc.relation.ispartof

PLoS One

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1371/journal.pone.0122809

dc.subject

Fisheries

dc.subject

Total Quality Management

dc.title

The fishery performance indicators: a management tool for triple bottom line outcomes.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Smith, Martin D|0000-0002-4714-463X

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25946194

pubs.begin-page

e0122809

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Economics

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published online

pubs.volume

10

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The fishery performance indicators: a management tool for triple bottom line outcomes.pdf
Size:
7.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format