Browsing by Subject "Medical Audit"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    CD34+ cell content of 126 341 cord blood units in the US inventory: implications for transplantation and banking.
    (Blood advances, 2019-04) Barker, Juliet N; Kempenich, Jane; Kurtzberg, Joanne; Brunstein, Claudio G; Delaney, Colleen; Milano, Filippo; Politikos, Ioannis; Shpall, Elizabeth J; Scaradavou, Andromachi; Dehn, Jason
    CD34+ cell dose is critical for cord blood (CB) engraftment. However, the CD34+ content of the CB inventory in the United States is unknown. We examined the CD34+ cell content of 126 341 red blood cell-depleted US units banked from January 2007 to September 2017 with a total nucleated cell (TNC) count of ≥90 × 107 and a cryovolume of 24-55 mL. Median pre-cryopreservation TNC content was 127 × 107 (interquartile range [IQR], 108-156 × 107); CD34+ cell content was 44 × 105 (IQR, 29 to 67 × 105). The median CD34+:TNC ratio was 0.34%. TNC and CD34+ cell content correlation was weak (r = 0.24). Of 7125 units with TNCs of ≥210 × 107, only 47% had CD34+ content of ≥100 × 105 However, some units had high CD34+ content for a given TNC count. Only 4% of CB units were acceptable as single-unit grafts (TNCs, ≥2.5 × 107/kg; CD34+ cells, ≥1.5 × 105/kg) for 70-kg patients; 22% of units were adequate for 70-kg patients using lower dose criteria (TNCs, ≥1.5 × 107/kg; CD34+ cells, ≥1.0 × 105/kg) suitable for a double-unit graft. These findings highlight that units with the highest TNC dose may not have the highest CD34+ dose, units with unexpectedly high CD34+ content (a ratio of >1.0%) should be verified, and the US CB inventory of adequately sized single units for larger patients is small. They also support the ongoing use of double-unit grafts, a focus on banking high-dose units, and development of expansion technologies.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    ItemOpen Access
    Improving Timely Resident Follow-Up and Communication of Results in Ambulatory Clinics Utilizing a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Module.
    (Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 2017-04) Boggan, Joel C; Swaminathan, Aparna; Thomas, Samantha; Simel, David L; Zaas, Aimee K; Bae, Jonathan G
    Failure to follow up and communicate test results to patients in outpatient settings may lead to diagnostic and therapeutic delays. Residents are less likely than attending physicians to report results to patients, and may face additional barriers to reporting, given competing clinical responsibilities.This study aimed to improve the rates of communicating test results to patients in resident ambulatory clinics.We performed an internal medicine, residency-wide, pre- and postintervention, quality improvement project using audit and feedback. Residents performed audits of ambulatory patients requiring laboratory or radiologic testing by means of a shared online interface. The intervention consisted of an educational module viewed with initial audits, development of a personalized improvement plan after Phase 1, and repeated real-time feedback of individual relative performance compared at clinic and program levels. Outcomes included results communicated within 14 days and prespecified "significant" results communicated within 72 hours.A total of 76 of 86 eligible residents (88%) reviewed 1713 individual ambulatory patients' charts in Phase 1, and 73 residents (85%) reviewed 1509 charts in Phase 2. Follow-up rates were higher in Phase 2 than Phase 1 for communicating results within 14 days and significant results within 72 hours (85% versus 78%, P < .001; and 82% versus 70%, P = .002, respectively). Communication of "significant" results was more likely to occur via telephone, compared with communication of nonsignificant results.Participation in a shared audit and feedback quality improvement project can improve rates of resident follow-up and communication of results, although communication gaps remained.