Innovations in Conservation Funding
Abstract
Too many environmental non-profits compete for funds amongst a limited pool of donors.
One fundamental value of the Wildlife Conservation Network (“WCN”), a U.S. 501(c)(3)
non-profit organization, is to approach fundraising with the lens of abundance rather
than scarcity. There is a need to identify innovative approaches to effectively reach,
engage, and enlist financial support from non-traditional sources of conservation
funding. This Capstone explores opportunities for wildlife conservation funding from
the for-profit sector, including corporate philanthropy, cause marketing partnerships,
and corporate social responsibility. For WCN, this is a little-tapped resource with
enormous growth potential, particularly suited for WCN's "high touch" donor engagement
model. We examine several factors that influence and support corporate giving: fostering
of empathy towards animals and wildlife (to leverage emotionally-driven philanthropy
and behavior); strengths-based management (to harness skills across a lean team to
support high-lift corporate engagements); and best practices in cause marketing engagements
(underscoring the impact of bespoke and meaningful consumer and donor experiences).
This Capstone is foundational to the growth of WCN's nascent corporate engagement
program, identifies new opportunities, and supports the development of a leadership
position to spearhead this effort.
Type
Master's projectSubject
Cause marketingWildlife conservation
Corporate philanthropy
Fundraising
Corporate social responsibility
Non-profit fundraising
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18334Citation
Wang, Joyce (2019). Innovations in Conservation Funding. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18334.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info