The Impact of Collegiate Athletic Success and Scandals on Admissions Applications
Abstract
This paper examines how the quantity and quality of admissions applications to Division
1 colleges and universities were affected by two non-academic factors: (1) performance
of a school’s men’s basketball and football teams; and (2) scandals associated with
these athletic programs. Admissions data from 2001 – 2017 were compared to team performance
during their football and basketball seasons in order to understand how these non-academic
factors contribute to an individual’s decisions to apply for admission. A multivariate
linear regression model with school and year fixed effects supported the hypothesis
that athletic success positively affects the quantity of applications, increasing
them by up to 3% in basketball and 11% in football in the following application period.
Seasonal football success was also shown to have negative impacts on the distribution
of standardized testing scores of future applicant classes, however these scores were
shown to increase when a team played their best season in five or more years. Additional
analysis of the effects of athletic program scandals reveals a significant negative
effect on the number of applications received, although a deep dive into a few of
the most prominent scandals suggests that the benefits associated with violating NCAA
rules may, under the right circumstances, be well worth the risk.
Type
Honors thesisDepartment
EconomicsPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18448Citation
Battle-McDonald, William (2019). The Impact of Collegiate Athletic Success and Scandals on Admissions Applications.
Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18448.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info