Skip to main content
Duke University Libraries
DukeSpace Scholarship by Duke Authors
  • Login
  • Ask
  • Menu
  • Login
  • Ask a Librarian
  • Search & Find
  • Using the Library
  • Research Support
  • Course Support
  • Libraries
  • About
View Item 
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Duke Dissertations
  • View Item
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Duke Dissertations
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Environmental toxicant effects on the dopaminergic system in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Strengths and limitations of various approaches to analysis

Thumbnail
View / Download
3.2 Mb
Date
2019
Author
Smith, Latasha L
Advisor
Meyer, Joel
Repository Usage Stats
124
views
57
downloads
Abstract

In order to develop a better understanding of the role environmental toxicants may play in the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases, it has become increasingly important to optimize sensitive methods for quickly screening toxicants to determine their ability to disrupt neuronal function. The model organism Caenorhabditis elegans can help with this effort. This species has an integrated nervous system producing behavioral function, allows for easy access for molecular studies, has a rapid lifespan, and is an inexpensive model. This project focuses on the development and optimization of a low-cost efficient behavioral tool for the identification of environmental toxicants with actions that disrupt dopamine function in the nematode C. elegans. Several dopamine-mediated locomotory behaviors, Area Exploration, Body Bends, and Reversals, as well as Swimming-Induced Paralysis and Learned 2-Nonanone Avoidance, were compared to determine the best behavioral method for screening purposes. These behavioral endpoints were also compared to morphological scoring of neurodegeneration in the dopamine neurons. We found that in adult worms, Area Exploration is more advantageous than the other behavioral methods for identifying DA-deficient locomotion and is comparable to neuromorphological scoring outputs. For larval stage worms, locomotion was an unreliable endpoint, and neuronal scoring appeared to be the best method. We compared the commonly used dat-1p::GFP reporter strains BY200 and BZ555, and we further characterized the dopamine-deficient strains, cat-2 e1112 and cat-2 n4547. We found that BY200 and BZ555 have differential responses in DA-targeted neurodegeneration using the model toxicant 6-hydroxydopamine, with BY200 appearing to have somewhat increased sensitivity to treatment. In contrast to published results, we found that the cat-2 strains slowed on food almost as much as N2s. Rather than being null mutants, both showed decreased levels of cat-2 mRNA and DA content, with cat-2 e1112 having the greatest reduction in DA content in comparison to N2. Ultimately, we concluded that while behavioral analysis is a promising endpoint, it is probably best used as a quick screening tool, with follow-up studies assessing affects to neuron morphology. A more informative readout of toxicant effects to the DA system would be best accomplished using a combination of the assays outlined in this project. We offer a table at the conclusion of this study comparing strengths, limitations, costs, and equipment needs for the methods of analysis of the dopaminergic system in C. elegans undertaken in this project.

Description
Dissertation
Type
Dissertation
Department
Pharmacology
Subject
Toxicology
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19891
Citation
Smith, Latasha L (2019). Environmental toxicant effects on the dopaminergic system in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Strengths and limitations of various approaches to analysis. Dissertation, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19891.
Collections
  • Duke Dissertations
More Info
Show full item record
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Rights for Collection: Duke Dissertations


Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info

Make Your Work Available Here

How to Deposit

Browse

All of DukeSpaceCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Duke University Libraries

Contact Us

411 Chapel Drive
Durham, NC 27708
(919) 660-5870
Perkins Library Service Desk

Digital Repositories at Duke

  • Report a problem with the repositories
  • About digital repositories at Duke
  • Accessibility Policy
  • Deaccession and DMCA Takedown Policy

TwitterFacebookYouTubeFlickrInstagramBlogs

Sign Up for Our Newsletter
  • Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Support the Libraries
Duke University