Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD: A Review.
Abstract
Background: Moral injury (MI) involves distress over having transgressed or violated
core moral boundaries, accompanied by feelings of guilt, shame, self-condemnation,
loss of trust, loss of meaning, and spiritual struggles. MI is often found in Veterans
and Active Duty Military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MI is
widespread among those with PTSD symptoms, adversely affects mental health, and may
increase risk of suicide; however, MI is often ignored and neglected by mental health
professionals who focus their attention on PTSD only. Methods: A review of the literature
between 1980 and 2018 conducted in 2018 is presented here to identify scales used
to assess MI. Databases used in this review were PsychInfo, PubMed (Medline), and
Google Scholar. Search terms were "moral injury," "measuring," "screening," "Veterans,"
and "Active Duty Military." Inclusion criteria were quantitative measurement of MI
and health outcomes, Veteran or Active Duty Military status, and peer-review publication.
Excluded were literature reviews, dissertations, book chapters, case reports, and
qualitative studies. Results: Of the 730 studies identified, most did not meet eligibility
criteria, leaving 118 full text articles that were reviewed, of which 42 did not meet
eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 76 studies, 34 were duplicates leaving 42 studies,
most published in 2013 or later. Of 22 studies that assessed MI, five used scales
assessing multiple dimensions, and 17 assessed only one or two aspects (e.g., guilt,
shame, or forgiveness). The remaining 20 studies used one of the scales reported in
the first 22. Of the five scales assessing multiple dimensions of MI, two assess both
morally injurious events and symptoms and the remaining three assess symptoms only.
All studies were cross-sectional, except three that tested interventions. Conclusions:
MI in the military setting is widespread and associated with PTSD symptom severity,
anxiety, depression, and risk of suicide in current or former military personnel.
Numerous measures exist to assess various dimensions of MI, including five multidimensional
scales, although future research is needed to identify cutoff scores and clinically
significant change scores. Three multidimensional measures assess MI symptoms alone
(not events) and may be useful for determining if treatments directed at MI may both
reduce symptoms and impact other mental health outcomes including PTSD.
Type
Journal articleSubject
Active Duty MilitaryVeterans
internal conflict
moral injury
posttraumatic stress disorder
screening
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21568Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00443Publication Info
Koenig, Harold G; Youssef, Nagy A; & Pearce, Michelle (2019). Assessment of Moral Injury in Veterans and Active Duty Military Personnel With PTSD:
A Review. Frontiers in psychiatry, 10(JUN). pp. 443. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00443. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21568.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Harold G. Koenig
Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
My primary research is focused on studying the effects of religion and spirituality
on health. I am founding Co-Director of Duke’s Center for Spirituality, Theology and
Health. For a complete bio and CV, go to the following website: https://spiritualityandhealth.duke.edu/index.php/harold-g-koenig-m-d
Michelle Janette Pearce
Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Alphabetical list of authors with Scholars@Duke profiles.

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info