ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Accuracy and Patient Dose in Neutron Stimulated Emission Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Liver Iron Overload: Simulations in GEANT4
Date
2007-08-13
Author
Advisors
Tourassi, Georgia D
Trahey, Gregg E
Repository Usage Stats
872
views
views
1,856
downloads
downloads
Abstract
Neutron stimulated emission computed tomography (NSECT) is being proposed as an experimental
technique to diagnose iron overload in patients. Proof-of-concept experiments have
suggested that NSECT may have potential to make a non-invasive diagnosis of iron overload
in a clinical system. The technique's sensitivity to high concentrations of iron combined
with tomographic acquisition ability gives it a unique advantage over other competing
modalities. While early experiments have demonstrated the efficacy of detecting samples
with high concentrations of iron, a tomography application for patient diagnosis has
never been tested. As with any other tomography system, the performance of NSECT will
depend greatly on the acquisition parameters that are used to scan the patient. In
order to determine the best acquisition geometry for a clinical system, it is important
to evaluate and understand the effects of varying each individual acquisition parameter
on the accuracy of the reconstructed image. This research work proposes to use Monte-Carlo
simulations to optimize a clinical NSECT system for iron overload diagnosis.Simulations
of two NSECT systems have been designed in GEANT4, a spectroscopy system to detect
uniform concentrations of iron in the liver, and a tomography system to detect non-uniform
iron overload. Each system has been used to scan simulated samples of both disease
models in humans to determine the best scanning strategy for each. The optimal scanning
strategy is defined as the combination of parameters that provides maximum accuracy
with minimum radiation dose. Evaluation of accuracy is performed through ROC analysis
of the reconstructed spectrums and images. For the spectroscopy system, the optimal
acquisition geometry is defined in terms of the number of neutrons required to detect
a clinically relevant concentration of iron. For the tomography system, the optimal
scanning strategy is defined in terms of the number of neutrons and the number of
spatial and angular translation steps used during acquisition. Patient dose for each
simulated system is calculated by measuring the energy deposited by the neutron beam
in the liver and surrounding body tissue. Simulation results indicate that both scanning
systems can detect wet iron concentrations of 5 mg/g or higher. Spectroscopic scanning
with sufficient accuracy is possible with 1 million neutrons per scan, corresponding
to a patient dose of 0.02 mSv. Tomographic scanning requires 8 angles that sample
the image matrix at 1 cm projection intervals with 4 million neutrons per projection,
which corresponds to a total body dose of 0.56 mSv. The research performed for this
dissertation has two important outcomes. First, it demonstrates that NSECT has the
clinical potential for iron overload diagnosis in patients. Second, it provides a
validated simulation of the NSECT system which can be used to guide future development
and experimental implementation of the technique.
Type
DissertationDepartment
Biomedical EngineeringPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/380Citation
Kapadia, Anuj (2007). Accuracy and Patient Dose in Neutron Stimulated Emission Computed Tomography for Diagnosis
of Liver Iron Overload: Simulations in GEANT4. Dissertation, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/380.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Duke Dissertations
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info