ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Differential Grading in North Carolina Public High Schools
Abstract
College admissions decisions often rest heavily on a student’s high school grades,
but teachers have significant flexibility in how they assign grades. Differential
grading occurs when students are held to different grading standards in courses with
the same curriculum and content. It may be due to various factors, including differences
in teacher grading standards, district grading policies, student characteristics,
teacher quality, and curriculum adherence. If it occurs systematically between districts,
schools, or student characteristics, then certain students may receive higher or lower
grades relative to other students, despite having the same content mastery or ability.
Statewide end-of-course (EOC) tests provide one way to measure differential grading
patterns. Using three years of statewide data on five subjects in North Carolina public
high schools, I find that districts with similar EOC test score averages have average
course grades that vary by as much as a letter grade, or 0.6 standard deviations.
In addition, student characteristics are stronger predictors of differential grading
than teacher, school, or district characteristics. Female, Limited English Proficient
(LEP), and 12th grade students earn statistically significant higher grades than other
students in all five subjects, holding test scores and teacher, school, and district
characteristics constant. Low-income students, conversely, earn lower grades than
other students, all else constant. Due to this differential grading, North Carolina
educators and policymakers should think carefully about removing EOC tests from the
curriculum. In addition, they should consider how to reduce differential grading and
its impact on college admissions.
Type
Master's projectDepartment
The Sanford School of Public PolicySubject
Differential grading, Grade Inflation, North Carolina, Standardized Testing, HOPE
Scholarship,Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5183Citation
Rauschenberg, Sam (2012). Differential Grading in North Carolina Public High Schools. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5183.More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Sanford School Master of Public Policy (MPP) Program Master’s Projects
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info