Community Reconstruction after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami
Abstract
Executive Summary
1 Research Question
This paper explores the reconstruction effort in Aceh following the 2004 Indian Ocean
Tsunami. The Indonesian government declared that the goal of the recovery would be
to ‘build back better’ that is, to take advantage of the attention and funds brought
about by the catastrophe in a way that would improve the quality of life for Aceh’s
residents. To evaluate whether reconstruction effectively met this expectation, we
observe the recovery’s path along three aspects:
i. Community investments in transportation and water/sanitation infrastructure
ii. Rebuilding of housing stock at the community level
iii. Home reconstruction at the household level
The existing disaster aid literature provides some suggestive methods of measuring
intervention, but there are no established metrics for evaluating overall success
or failure of reconstruction projects, much less full post-disaster recovery efforts.
While we cannot specifically determine whether or not Aceh’s reconstruction generated
more wealth or utility for its residents than was destroyed by the tsunami or could
have been generated through other methods, this paper seeks to identify changes in
community infrastructure and housing stock that are likely to contribute to individual
health and well-being.
2 Background & Context
On December 26, 2004 an earthquake measuring 9.3 on the Richter scale occurred in
the Indian Ocean, just off the west coast of Sumatra. A massive tsunami resulted,
devastating the province of Aceh, one of Indonesia’s least developed regions. The
massive rebuilding effort is widely acknowledged to have changed the face of Aceh.
Despite the expense and scale of reconstruction, however, there have been few formal
efforts to objectively evaluate the recovery in terms of scope and effectiveness.
3 Data and Sample
Our data come from the Study of the Tsunami Aftermath and Recovery (STAR). STAR converted
a pre-tsunami socioeconomic survey led by Statistics Indonesia (SUSENAS) into a broad-based
panel survey. The 409 enumeration areas and 6,184 households described in this paper
were first surveyed by SUSENAS in 2004, and by STAR annually thereafter. By exploiting
the pre-tsunami baseline and extensively tracking survivors (93% of which were interviewed
face-to-face), STAR provides a unique perspective on the tsunami’s effects.
4 Methodology and Results
i. Community-level infrastructure investments
Beginning with transportation infrastructure, we identify the effect of the tsunami
on road and bridge damage in Aceh. We then explore correlates of physical recovery
and perceived improvements, again comparing communities in heavy damage areas to those
relatively less affected by the tsunami. Turning to water and sanitation, we identify
trends in access to protected water sources and modern sanitation methods.
ii. Home reconstruction at the community level
Using reported occupancy rates, counts of rebuilt homes, and population estimates,
we consider changes in overall housing stock as a possible indicator for overbuilding.
iii. Home reconstruction at the household level
We begin by describing housing quality before the tsunami according to material and
construction characteristics, subsequently illustrating how the distribution of these
characteristics changed immediately after the tsunami and throughout the recovery.
Finally, we explore the possibility of differential aid receipt according to household
and community characteristics.
5 Discussion and Conclusions
This paper exploits a panel data set uniquely suited to identifying the impact of
one of the costliest disasters in human history on the community and household level.
Our analyses suggest that at the community level, post-tsunami recovery has triggered
a development effort much broader than the reach of the tsunami itself. Particularly
in the realm of transportation infrastructure, where most communities report improvements
over pre-tsunami roads and bridges, much of Aceh finds itself better off today than
in 2004. Income and location appear to be important predictors of improvements in
water and sanitation, suggesting areas for improved public intervention. We also identify
possible evidence of aid dependency in heavily damaged areas.
While analysis does not dismiss the possibility of overbuilding, we generally find
that aid agencies accurately replaced the housing destroyed by the tsunami. There
is little evidence of differential aid distribution among households experiencing
tsunami damage. Although there is some convergence in quality along certain characteristics,
it appears that significant differences in overall home quality remain.
Type
Master's projectDepartment
The Sanford School of Public PolicyPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5353Citation
Burrows, Michael (2012). Community Reconstruction after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/5353.More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Sanford School Master of Public Policy (MPP) Program Master’s Projects
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info