Morrow Pacific: Life Cycle Assessment of a Coal Export Project
Date
2013-04-25
Author
Advisor
Patino-Echeverri, Dalia
Repository Usage Stats
902
views
views
1,491
downloads
downloads
Abstract
Stricter emissions requirements on coal-fired power plants together with low natural
gas prices have contributed to a recent decline in the use of coal for electricity
generation in the United States. Faced with a shrinking domestic market, many coal
companies are taking advantage of a growing coal export market. As a result, U.S.
coal exports hit an all-time high in 2012, fueled largely by demand in Asia. The
Australian firm Ambre Energy is currently pursuing a permit to develop and operate
a coal export project in Oregon that will ship 8.8 million tons of Powder River Basin
coal annually to Asian markets via rail, river barge, and ocean vessel. This study
uses a hybrid life cycle assessment model to conduct the only environmental life cycle
analysis of the project to date. Social and environmental impacts are quantified
and monetized to provide a full picture of the project’s externalities as a basis
for comparison to other energy export alternatives. Findings show that fuel combustion
during the three transport phases of the project contributes significant emissions
add-ons to the pollution profile of the exported coal. This study highlights the
unintended social and environmental consequences of policies intended to reduce air
emissions from domestic coal-fired power plants.
Type
Master's projectSubject
coal exportmorrow pacific project
life cycle assessment
energy transport
coal export project
morrow pacific
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6821Citation
Bohnengel, Andrew Barrett (2013). Morrow Pacific: Life Cycle Assessment of a Coal Export Project. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6821.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info