ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
State Leaders in Providing Common Core-Aligned Instructional Materials
Abstract
The Education Trust (Ed Trust) is a non-profit organization whose mission is to promote
academic achievement for all students at all levels nationwide. One of Ed Trust’s
six main advocacy agenda items is support for college- and career-ready education
standards in all states. As part of its commitment, Ed Trust supports state adoption
of the Common Core State Standards (Common Core) to raise the bar for student achievement
across the nation.
Policy Questions
(1) Which states can The Education Trust identify as leaders in providing instructional
materials to support teachers in the transition to the Common Core State Standards?
(2) What characteristics of the leader states’ efforts in providing Common Core-aligned
instructional materials can promising states use as they develop Common Core-aligned
curricula?
Identifying Leader States
Of the 45 states which have adopted the Common Core, only some of them have developed
Common Core-aligned instructional materials for teachers at the state level. Among
these participating states, the threshold criterion for a “leader” state in this study
is development of Common Core-aligned instructional materials and making the materials
available to teachers in their states. To determine which states have made the most
progress in providing instructional materials for teachers, this project examines:
the range of Common Core-aligned instructional materials provided in each state, the
accessibility of materials, and differentiation of the materials for such special
student populations as English Language Learners. The leader states are divided into
three groups:
Leader of the Pack states: New York and Tennessee
Full Steam Ahead states: Colorado, Illinois, Maryland and Massachusetts
Strong Start states: Delaware, Georgia and Kentucky
Promising States
Forty-five states have adopted the Common Core, and states are able to learn from
one another during implementation. The leader states have learned valuable lessons
which provide possible policies, strategies, and initiatives that “promising” states
can use to support their teachers in the transition to the Common Core
A promising state is a state with the beginning resources and political will to develop
Common Core-aligned instruction materials for their teachers. Promising states have
indicated interest in developing Common Core resources by planning for Common Core
implementation in applications for Race to the Top grants or No Child Left Behind
(NCLB) waivers.
Promising States include: Louisiana North Carolina Pennsylvania
New Jersey Ohio Rhode Island
Recommendations for Promising States
I recommend that promising states pursue the following strategies:
(1) Partner with curriculum creators. Most state departments of education do not have
the capacity, expertise, or time to create a comprehensive set of instructional materials
by the 2014-2015 school year when teachers and students will be held accountable for
their performance on the Common Core. In the past, most districts have purchased curriculum
materials from independent companies specializing in curriculum creation. States can
modify this practice by partnering with curriculum companies or non-profit education
organizations to develop Common Core-aligned instructional materials.
(2) Utilize additional sources of funding. Limited financial resources is a significant
barrier for states working to create Common Core-aligned instructional materials.
Fortunately, education is an area of emphasis for foundations looking to fund projects.
States can access funds through such entities as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
which prioritize Common Core implementation.
(3) Establish “working groups” of state education experts to create instructional
materials. Within every state, a group of experienced and knowledgeable educators
can work together to develop instructional materials aligned to the Common Core. States
can create working groups of teachers and administrators who can combine their knowledge
of the Common Core, the needs of their students, and their instructional expertise.
(4) Create resource-sharing spaces for educators to share Common Core-aligned instructional
materials. A benefit of the Common Core is that teachers are able to share resources
across schools, districts, and states, because they are teaching the same skills and
concepts. States can encourage the practice of sharing Common Core-aligned materials
by creating online spaces for teachers to post and search for ready-to-use instructional
resources.
(5) Build resources in stages. Almost every state included in this report developed
their pool of Common Core-aligned instructional materials over time and built on previously
created resources. States can purposefully plan the creation of instructional materials
by phasing in resources and building upon previously created materials.
(6) Encourage teachers to use resources from other states and organizations. Some
states have not developed their own set of Common Core-aligned instructional materials
for teachers because they lack the resources or are traditionally local-control states.
States can take advantage of the common nature of the Common Core by utilizing quality
standards-aligned materials created by other states or organizations.
Type
Master's projectDepartment
The Sanford School of Public PolicySubject
Common CorePermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8455Citation
Fago, Cassandra (2014). State Leaders in Providing Common Core-Aligned Instructional Materials. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8455.More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Sanford School Master of Public Policy (MPP) Program Master’s Projects
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info