Skip to main content
Duke University Libraries
DukeSpace Scholarship by Duke Authors
  • Login
  • Ask
  • Menu
  • Login
  • Ask a Librarian
  • Search & Find
  • Using the Library
  • Research Support
  • Course Support
  • Libraries
  • About
View Item 
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Theses
  • View Item
  •   DukeSpace
  • Theses and Dissertations
  • Masters Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Cost-effectiveness of Interferon Gamma Release Assay (QFT-IT) as a Diagnostic Test for Intraocular Tuberculosis

Thumbnail
View / Download
1.5 Mb
Date
2014
Author
Chen, Shu
Advisor
Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
Repository Usage Stats
245
views
262
downloads
Abstract

Background:

Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs) have proven to be potential replacement of tuberculin skin test (TST) in screening and diagnosing tuberculosis as shown by previous health economic studies. Given that these studies all center on pulmonary tuberculosis, we sought to examine the cost-effectiveness of IGRAs, specifically QFT-IT, as a diagnostic test for intraocular tuberculosis among uveitis patients in Singapore.

Method:

A decision tree was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the QFT-IT for diagnosing intraocular tuberculosis among uveitis patients over a 30-year horizon. The input data were based on a cohort of 102 patients who presented with symptoms of uveitis and underwent relevant treatment and follow-up visits from 2009 to 2010 at Singapore National Eye Center (SNEC). By calculating their incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, we compared the cost-effectiveness of three strategies: TST alone, QFT-IT alone and TST followed by QFT-IT as a confirmatory test.

Results:

Our results show that in cost terms alone, QFT-IT alone strategy is the most expensive one (889 SGD per person), followed by TST alone (850 SGD per person) and finally the dual strategy (789 SGD per person). While examining effectiveness alone, TST alone strategy is the most effective one that helps gain 17.4923 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) followed by QFT-IT alone and the dual strategy. Using the conventional willingness to pay of 50,000 USD/QALY (63000 SGD/QALY), having an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 1644 SGD/QALY demonstrates that TST alone strategy is the best choice to screen ocular TB in Singapore.

Conclusion:

Given the local ocular tuberculosis prevalence and key assumptions made in the analysis model, the TST alone strategy is recommended to diagnose intraocular TB among uveitis patients in Singapore.

Type
Master's thesis
Department
Global Health
Subject
Public health
Cost-effectiveness analysis
IGRA
Ocular tuberculosis
TST
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8809
Citation
Chen, Shu (2014). Cost-effectiveness of Interferon Gamma Release Assay (QFT-IT) as a Diagnostic Test for Intraocular Tuberculosis. Master's thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8809.
Collections
  • Masters Theses
More Info
Show full item record
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Rights for Collection: Masters Theses


Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info

Make Your Work Available Here

How to Deposit

Browse

All of DukeSpaceCommunities & CollectionsAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionAuthorsTitlesTypesBy Issue DateDepartmentsAffiliations of Duke Author(s)SubjectsBy Submit Date

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
Duke University Libraries

Contact Us

411 Chapel Drive
Durham, NC 27708
(919) 660-5870
Perkins Library Service Desk

Digital Repositories at Duke

  • Report a problem with the repositories
  • About digital repositories at Duke
  • Accessibility Policy
  • Deaccession and DMCA Takedown Policy

TwitterFacebookYouTubeFlickrInstagramBlogs

Sign Up for Our Newsletter
  • Re-use & Attribution / Privacy
  • Harmful Language Statement
  • Support the Libraries
Duke University