Chieftaincy Reimagined: Modernity and Tradition in the Chefferie of Batoufam, Cameroon
Repository Usage Stats
This thesis uses chieftaincy in Cameroon, and specifically the chefferie (chieftainship) of Batoufam, as a lens through which to understand the complex tensions between modernity and tradition in postcolonial Africa. After presenting a historical study of Grassfield chiefs’ role in the modern Cameroonian state, I analyze the relationship between tradition and modernity through the case study of the chief of Batoufam, Cameroon. My research drew upon several weeks of conducting over twenty-five interviews with village leaders, including the chief and several notables, in order to understand why traditional institutions in African nations are continually excluded from the global development industry. I argue that, not only can traditional institutions produce aspects of Western modernity, but these institutions in Cameroon also utilize liberal and neoliberal practices in the interest of community goals, mobilizing Western strategies for new and different purposes. I conclude that traditional institutions in Africa are not merely reproducing a Western model of modernity, but are in fact reshaping modernity itself through new conceptualizations, forms and applications. These traditional institutions thus present a critical resource for development, suggesting alternate strategies and future realities.
Descriptionhonors thesis; awarded honors
DepartmentInternational Comparative Studies
SubjectCameroon grassfields, Batoufam, chieftaincy, traditional leadership, modernity, liberalism and neoliberalism
CitationGrace, Jaclyn (2015). Chieftaincy Reimagined: Modernity and Tradition in the Chefferie of Batoufam, Cameroon. Honors thesis, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/9730.
More InfoShow full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Undergraduate Honors Theses and Student papers
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info