Herbert Marcuse's Early Critique of Idealism

dc.contributor.advisor

Gillespie, Michael A

dc.contributor.author

Dabrowski, Tomash Conrad

dc.date.accessioned

2013-05-13T15:37:43Z

dc.date.available

2014-05-08T04:30:05Z

dc.date.issued

2013

dc.department

Political Science

dc.description.abstract

Herbert Marcuse's early essays and reviews written while under the tutelage of Martin Heidegger continue to suffer a poor reception. Even the most sympathetic of his critics widely focus on either his deviations from existing Marxist orthodoxy, or his failure to demonstrate the commensurability of Marxism and existentialism. Although both these concerns highlight important problems in Marcuse's work, this narrow focus of Marcuse scholarship neglects essential aspects of his early thought and tends to draw too hasty parallels between Marcuse and Heidegger. This thesis therefore attaches greater weight to Marcuse's own reception and understanding of a broader cross section of the concurrent intellectual milieu - particularly late nineteenth and early twentieth century debates as to whether idealist philosophy is portable to social science. I argue that by foregrounding Marcuse's early work against the backdrop of neo-idealism better illuminates Marcuse's concern with what types of truth claims inform political action, and how one might assess the validity of these claims.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/7304

dc.subject

Political Science

dc.subject

Philosophy

dc.subject

Frankfurt School

dc.subject

Hegel

dc.subject

Heidegger

dc.subject

Historicism

dc.subject

Idealism

dc.subject

Marcuse

dc.title

Herbert Marcuse's Early Critique of Idealism

dc.type

Master's thesis

duke.embargo.months

12

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dabrowski_duke_0066N_11913.pdf
Size:
380.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections