Flavors of Responsibility

dc.contributor.advisor

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter

dc.contributor.author

Meyer, Susanne

dc.date.accessioned

2017-01-04T20:34:38Z

dc.date.available

2017-01-04T20:34:38Z

dc.date.issued

2016

dc.department

Philosophy

dc.description.abstract

In this thesis, I will assess the question of what it means to be responsible for an action, and attempt to unify the various concepts around the conception of answerability. Focusing on that notion, I argue, will gives a better understanding of the other proposed conceptions of responsibility: that of attributability and that of accountability. I will come up with three connected definitions corresponding to these notions, and show that once we refine our concept of responsibility, it is possible for an agent to be responsible in one way, and not another. I demonstrate this contention on the test case of the psychopath.

Keywords: moral responsibility, answerability, psychopathy

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13353

dc.subject

Philosophy

dc.subject

Ethics

dc.subject

Moral Responsibility

dc.subject

Psychopathy

dc.title

Flavors of Responsibility

dc.type

Dissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Meyer_duke_0066D_13229.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections