Evaluating the Benefits: Environmental Impacts of Repurposing Oil and Gas Infrastructure for Enhanced Geothermal Electricity Generation Systems

Limited Access
This item is unavailable until:
2026-04-28

Date

2025-04-25

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

54
views
1
downloads

Abstract

Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) provide carbon-free baseload electricity, a viable alternative to fossil fuels. Repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells for EGS reduces costs, but its environmental impacts remain underexplored. This study employs Life Cycle Assessment inventory analysis to compare the environmental impact of repurposed versus greenfield (BAU) EGS across exploration, construction, operation, and end-of-life stages. Repurposed EGS reduced land transformation as reuse brownfield land, and slightly lowered climate change impacts due to reduced drilling needs. Repurposed systems yielded increased water consumption, primarily due incorporating well stimulation, which requires large water inputs normalized by lower lifetime electricity output as compared to BAU. Though repurposed EGS produces less lifetime electricity, its reduced cost, resource use and direct land use change impacts make it a viable option to transition existing oil and gas infrastructure toward cleaner energy production.

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Enhanced Geothermal Energy Systems, Repurposing Oil and Gas Infrastructure, Geothermal Energy, EGS, Life Cycle Assessment

Citation

Citation

Kuuskvere, Cara, Rosalind Hu and Ayoung Kim (2025). Evaluating the Benefits: Environmental Impacts of Repurposing Oil and Gas Infrastructure for Enhanced Geothermal Electricity Generation Systems. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/32310.


Except where otherwise noted, student scholarship that was shared on DukeSpace after 2009 is made available to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution / Non-commercial / No derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) license. All rights in student work shared on DukeSpace before 2009 remain with the author and/or their designee, whose permission may be required for reuse.