What Have We GAINed? An Analysis of Federal Incentive Policies in the Orphan and Anti-Infective Drug Markets

Angrist, Misha

Hoerger, Ryan

2016-01-27T16:43:06Z

2016-01-27T16:43:06Z

2016-01-27

Public Policy Studies

The world faces a growing danger in the form of antibiotic resistance and a dwindling anti-infective pipeline. To help combat the threat, Congress passed legislation (the “GAIN Act”) in 2012 that grants five years of additional exclusivity—or protection from competition from generic products—to drug applications that are designated as qualified infectious disease products (QIDPs). The exclusivity incentive is nearly a carbon copy of the hallmark design of the 1983 Orphan Drug Act, which was passed to spur development of treatments for rare diseases. This thesis addresses the effectiveness of incentive policies in facilitating drug development in the orphan drug market for rare diseases and the anti-infective drug market. Using pricing data from Medicare Part D program and drug databases, the research develops frameworks for both the orphan and anti-infective markets and finds that the two markets vary widely across all measured categories. During the course of the past decade, anti-infectives became less of a priority in the development pipelines of the world’s top pharmaceutical companies, and content analysis of earnings call transcripts reveals that industry executives do not seem to be discussing the new incentive. The results indicate that a new or augmented approach to anti-infectives may be needed. Instead of using exclusivity, the government should consider offering benefits that companies realize at the front end of the research and development pipeline as a means to increase drug development in the anti-infective drug market.

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11543

en_US

anti-infective

GAIN

Congress

Orphan Drug Act

Antibiotics

What Have We GAINed? An Analysis of Federal Incentive Policies in the Orphan and Anti-Infective Drug Markets

Honors thesis