The Effect of Setup Uncertainty on Optimal Dosimetric Margin in Linac-based Stereotactic Radiosurgery with dynamic conformal arc technique

dc.contributor.advisor

Yin, Fang-Fang

dc.contributor.author

Duan, Xiaoyu

dc.date.accessioned

2018-05-31T21:18:58Z

dc.date.available

2018-05-31T21:18:58Z

dc.date.issued

2018

dc.department

Medical Physics

dc.description.abstract

Purpose: Using a simulation study 1) to estimate the effect of setup uncertainty on optimal dosimetric margin by analyzing dose distribution and biological effect of LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with a dynamic conformal arc (DCA) technique; 2) to find the suitable prescription percentage isodose surface (%IDS) for a given the setup error and dosimetric margin to reach an optimal dose distribution and favorable biological effect.

Methods and materials: In this project, SRS treatment plans were made based on Rando head phantom’s computed tomography (CT) scans. Photon beam with 6 megavoltage (MV) energy was used to deliver 20 Gy prescription dose in one fraction. Plans were simulated in a commercial treatment planning system (Brainlab iPlan RT Dose ver. 4.5.4), using four non-coplanar DCAs with total gantry angles of 480 degrees. A single sphere brain lesion with 4 different diameters (5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm, and 30 mm) was simulated at the center of the head phantom. Five plans each with different dosimetric margins (-1 mm, 0 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm) were generated for each planning target volume (PTV), which is equal to the volume of the simulated lesion with a uniformly expanded margin. For each plan, the isocenter position was shifted to 15 different locations (in three orthogonal directions each with 0 mm, 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm shift) to imitate the potential setup errors in a fixed multileaf collimator (MLC) shape. To evaluate the plan quality, three dosimetric parameters: Conformity Index (CI), Heterogeneity Index (HI), Gradient Index (GI), and three biological effect parameters: generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)-based Tumor Control Probability (TCP), Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP), and biological objective function p+= TCP x (1-NTCP) were calculated after normalizing the dose-volume histogram for each plan to different %IDSs, ranging from 50%~98% with 1% increment.

Results: With up to a 2 mm setup error, a smaller dosimetric margin results in a smaller GI with lower p+. A larger dosimetric margin results in a larger GI. Compared to 0 mm and -1 mm dosimetric margins, a 1 mm dosimetric margin could result in a much higher p+. Compared to 2 mm and 3 mm dosimetric margins, a 1 mm dosimetric margin could result in a smaller GI while achieving an equivalent p+ in a certain range of %IDS. For a given 2 mm setup error and 1 mm dosimetric margin, an optimal %IDS range could be given by considering CI smaller than 2.5, small GI, and high p+. The %IDS ranges optimized in this simulation study for each PTV were: around 70%IDS (5 mm diameter); around 80%IDS (10 mm diameter); 63%~70%IDS (20 mm diameter); 66%~79%IDS (30 mm diameter). For the 5 mm diameter PTV, the constraint of CI smaller than 2.5 was not satisfied, compromising the dose conformity to achieve a high tumor control probability. For a given 1.5 mm setup error and a 2 mm dosimetric margin, the %IDS ranges for different PTV sizes were: 53%~68%IDS (5 mm diameter); 58%~70%IDS (10 mm diameter); 68%~75%IDS (20 mm diameter); 65%~77%IDS (30 mm diameter). For PTVs with both 5 mm and 10 mm diameters, the constraint of CI smaller than 2.5 was not satisfied, compromising the dose conformity to achieve a high tumor control probability.

Conclusion: This simulation study estimated the effect of setup uncertainty on optimal dosimetric margin for the LINAC-based SRS with the DCA technique. It also recommended the suitable prescription percentage isodose surface (%IDS) for a given setup error and dosimetric margin to reach an optimal dose distribution and favorable biological effect. With 1 mm dosimetric margin and a suitable selection of %IDS between 63%~80% based on PTV size, proper target conformity, TCP and NTCP can still be reached even with up to 2 mm of setup error.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17055

dc.subject

Therapy

dc.subject

conformity index

dc.subject

dosimetric margin

dc.subject

normal tissue sparing

dc.subject

setup error

dc.subject

stereotactic radiosurgery

dc.subject

tumor control probability

dc.title

The Effect of Setup Uncertainty on Optimal Dosimetric Margin in Linac-based Stereotactic Radiosurgery with dynamic conformal arc technique

dc.type

Master's thesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Duan_duke_0066N_14661.pdf
Size:
2.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections