Maintaining Flexibility and Options in Alternatives Development: A Case Study of the Successful Use of Modeling, Agency Coordination and Public Involvement to Determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative for a 17-Mile Transportation Project
dc.contributor.author | Kovasckitz, Liz | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-27T13:46:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-27T13:46:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-11-27 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper explores the alternatives development process for a North Carolina Department of Transportation new location roadway project. The case study will identify how potential project conflicts were avoided or resolved through a commitment to a comprehensive evaluation of a full range of alternatives, frequent agency and public coordination and maintaining flexibility. This approach reduced the length of time typically needed for a project of this size to reach the selection of the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative by approximately 40 percent and will help to streamline the permitting process. | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.subject | NEPA, Environment, North Carolina Department of Transportation | |
dc.title | Maintaining Flexibility and Options in Alternatives Development: A Case Study of the Successful Use of Modeling, Agency Coordination and Public Involvement to Determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative for a 17-Mile Transportation Project | |
dc.type | Report |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- L. KovasckitzDELP NEPA Cert Capstone Paper_Final.PDF
- Size:
- 2.09 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format