Maintaining Flexibility and Options in Alternatives Development: A Case Study of the Successful Use of Modeling, Agency Coordination and Public Involvement to Determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative for a 17-Mile Transportation Project

dc.contributor.author

Kovasckitz, Liz

dc.date.accessioned

2012-11-27T13:46:40Z

dc.date.available

2012-11-27T13:46:40Z

dc.date.issued

2012-11-27

dc.description.abstract

This paper explores the alternatives development process for a North Carolina Department of Transportation new location roadway project. The case study will identify how potential project conflicts were avoided or resolved through a commitment to a comprehensive evaluation of a full range of alternatives, frequent agency and public coordination and maintaining flexibility. This approach reduced the length of time typically needed for a project of this size to reach the selection of the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative by approximately 40 percent and will help to streamline the permitting process.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6016

dc.language.iso

en_US

dc.subject

NEPA, Environment, North Carolina Department of Transportation

dc.title

Maintaining Flexibility and Options in Alternatives Development: A Case Study of the Successful Use of Modeling, Agency Coordination and Public Involvement to Determine the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative for a 17-Mile Transportation Project

dc.type

Report

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
L. KovasckitzDELP NEPA Cert Capstone Paper_Final.PDF
Size:
2.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format