Use of mobile tablet devices and reduction in time to perioperative transesophageal echocardiography reporting: a historical cohort study

dc.contributor.author

Bottiger, Brandi

dc.contributor.author

McCartney, Sharon

dc.contributor.author

Akushevich, Igor

dc.contributor.author

Nicoara, Alina

dc.contributor.author

Yanamadala, Mamata

dc.contributor.author

Swaminathan, Madhav

dc.date.accessioned

2017-06-05T19:49:49Z

dc.date.available

2017-06-05T19:49:49Z

dc.date.issued

2015-01-01

dc.description.abstract

© 2014, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.Purpose: Timely communication of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings to the postoperative care team is critical to optimizing patient care. We compared the use of a personal computer (PC) system with the use of a mobile tablet device (MTD) system for point-of-care TEE data entry and hypothesized that the MTD-based system would reduce the time to preliminary TEE reporting and decrease the incidence of delinquent reporting by 50%. Methods: In this historical cohort study, we reviewed 508 perioperative TEE reports entered by cardiothoracic anesthesia fellows. Reports were grouped based on whether data were entered on a PC (PC group) or a MTD (MTD group). Time to TEE reporting was defined as the time from the patient leaving the operating room to the time the TEE report was generated. Delinquent reports were defined as those generated >24 hr after the initial exam. Time to TEE reporting and incidence of delinquent reports were compared between the two groups. Results: Mean (SD) time to TEE reporting was significantly improved with MTD data entry vs PC data entry [233 (676) min vs 1,103 (3,830) min, respectively; mean difference 870 min; 95% confidence interval (CI) 293 to 1,448; P = 0.003], and median (IQR) time was also significantly improved [46 (163) min vs 126 (1,000) min, respectively; median difference 80 min; P = 0.0002]. The incidence of report delinquency with MTD data entry vs PC data entry was also significantly reduced [2.1% vs 6.8%, respectively; mean difference 2.2%; 95% CI 0.5 to 9.0; P = 0.02]. Conclusion: Implementation of a MTD system for data entry leads to improved TEE reporting time and reduces TEE reporting delinquency. Further studies are required to determine whether this strategy enhances quality of reporting, optimizes communication between care teams, and improves outcomes without increasing costs.

dc.identifier.eissn

1496-8975

dc.identifier.issn

0832-610X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14823

dc.publisher

Springer New York LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s12630-014-0250-6

dc.title

Use of mobile tablet devices and reduction in time to perioperative transesophageal echocardiography reporting: a historical cohort study

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Bottiger, Brandi|0000-0002-0844-1412

duke.contributor.orcid

Nicoara, Alina|0000-0002-3814-6182

duke.contributor.orcid

Swaminathan, Madhav|0000-0001-9136-8609

pubs.begin-page

31

pubs.end-page

36

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology, Cardiothoracic

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Population Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Geriatrics

pubs.organisational-group

Physics

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Social Science Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

62

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Use of mobile tablet devices and reduction in time to perioperative transesophageal echocardiography reporting a historical cohort study.pdf
Size:
359.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format