Strategies for Referring Cancer Patients in a Smoking Cessation Program.

dc.contributor.author

Davis, James M

dc.contributor.author

Thomas, Leah C

dc.contributor.author

Dirkes, Jillian EH

dc.contributor.author

Swartzwelder, H Scott

dc.date.accessioned

2020-09-01T13:39:34Z

dc.date.available

2020-09-01T13:39:34Z

dc.date.issued

2020-08-21

dc.date.updated

2020-09-01T13:39:33Z

dc.description.abstract

Most people who smoke and develop cancer are unable to quit smoking. To address this, many cancer centers have now opened smoking cessation programs specifically designed to help cancer patients to quit. An important question has now emerged-what is the most effective approach for engaging smokers within a cancer center in these smoking cessation programs? We report outcomes from a retrospective observational study comparing three referral methods-traditional referral, best practice advisory (BPA), and direct outreach-on utilization of the Duke Cancer Center Smoking Cessation Program. We found that program utilization rate was higher for direct outreach (5.4%) than traditional referral (0.8%), p < 0.001, and BPA (0.2%); p < 0.001. Program utilization was 6.4% for all methods combined. Inferring a causal relationship between referral method and program utilization was not possible because the study did not use a randomized design. Innovation is needed to generate higher utilization rates for cancer center smoking cessation programs.

dc.identifier

ijerph17176089

dc.identifier.issn

1661-7827

dc.identifier.issn

1660-4601

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21392

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

MDPI AG

dc.relation.ispartof

International journal of environmental research and public health

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3390/ijerph17176089

dc.subject

electronic health record

dc.subject

program utilization

dc.subject

referral methods

dc.subject

smoking cessation

dc.title

Strategies for Referring Cancer Patients in a Smoking Cessation Program.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Davis, James M|0000-0002-7196-5649

duke.contributor.orcid

Swartzwelder, H Scott|0000-0001-5845-1670

pubs.begin-page

1

pubs.end-page

12

pubs.issue

17

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychology and Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

17

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IJERPH Paper .pdf
Size:
907.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format